Models of atom are not perfect since they exhibit more features which are not present in model.Hence, an improvement is always required.
I suppose on some atom models the electron cloud would be called "fuzzy".
no comment
Experiments showed that the atom is made up of smaller particles.
Niels Bohr in fact based his model on the hydrogen atom. However, I wouldn't say that the Bohr Model can be correctly applied to ANY atom. Whilst it is an excellent approximation it is not truly accurate. Please don't forget that the Bohr Model is just that, a model, and a model is never as accurate as the real thing.
the answer is atom because even if it is the last one an atom is the smallest
globes
When the models are not shown a person will not be able to know if there are any hydrogen atoms between them. If the models are shown a person will be able to know the answer.
you can create very accurate models using a computer
Atomic models tell us about the structure of an atom which is based on what we know about how atoms behave. But it is not necessary that it will be a genuine picture of the structure of an atom.
there really is no pictures of atoms. being too small for the eye to see, even with a microscope (except an electron microscope) we have no accurate photos or models to show what the exact atom looks like.
its are dalton's,thompson's,rutherford's,bohr'sand quantummechanical models that's all folks
Accurate measurements help allow for accurate results in cooking. A perfect example is in baking.
the atom model
What does WHAT mean by evolving models of care??? HOW does that apply to Pokemon?! GIVE IT ACCURATE CATEGORIES!!!
I suppose on some atom models the electron cloud would be called "fuzzy".
Zayn
that depends on how accurate u want it to be