answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Wattle was favored in some places, but stone was favored in others. The issue was largely a matter of custom and availability of materials. Stone buildings tended to last longer than wattle and daub, but they were also more difficult to build and maintain, and they were not necessarily any more comfortable. There were areas of Europe where so little stone was available that castles were built of bricks. There were other areas where there was so much stone available that it seemed silly not to use it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago

Not all houses were of wood. Most manor houses and the homes of wealthy merchants were built of stone.

The houses of the poor were traditionally built of oak, using long beams of timber set in shallow slots in the ground. These formed the foundations for walls of wattle and daub, and for timber uprights to support the roof beams. This method was not only very old (and therefore traditional), but it was simple, quick and easy to build without large numbers of skilled people.

Such houses would gradually rot away and needed to be replaced about each 20 years, allowing for changes in size to be incorporated if necessary.

The only trace left in the ground from these structures is the beam slots, indicated in changes in soil colour during modern excavations.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

14y ago

Actually, they are the ones we see today because they have survived time since they are made of stone, but a majority of the houses were waddle. Waddle is a combination of mud, straw, dung, and other things. It was put on by hand on a frame and allowed to dry. Then, it was painted over with a white wash. The roof would be bundles of straw. With time these fall apart or have to be repaired. If there was a national disaster or a fire they would be destroyed. Wooden buildings are the same way. Over time they would fall apart and that is why you only see stone. Ever notice that they don't have a roof? Again, because the roof was made of straw or something else.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why are most houses in Cotswolds made of stone?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about General History

What kinds of materials did the Mayans use to build houses?

The Mayans lacked many tools, such as metal tools, pulleys, and perhaps even the wheel. They did, however, have an abundance of materials. The most common material was limestone, taken from local quarries. Limestone was easy to work, and only hardened once removed from its bed. In addition, it could also be used as mortar or stucco. Common homes used wooden poles, adobe (a mixture of straw and sandy clay), and thatch; however, houses made of limestone have been found as well. In the city of Comalcalco, fired-clay bricks have been found as a substitute for stone. The Mayan's used clay, stone, limestone, thatched hay, wooden poles, and metal to make common day houses.


What building material was used in homes during Colonial America?

States where colonists settled had abundant forests. Most buildings were at first log cabins with mud packed between the logs. Later, they used stone or brick. When saw mills started, they use sawed timber planks for wood frame houses.


Where did most Egyptians live?

Most Egyptians were peasants, so they mostly lived in small houses made out of mud or other Natural Resources.


Why are most houses made of bricks not stone?

BRICK:· Conforms to different designs / shapes.· Non-flammable.· Waterproof.· Strong.· Long-lasting.· Inexpensive.· Doesn't conduct electricity.· Durable / weatherproof.And the big, bad wolf can't blow it down ...


What were the houses like in rhode island?

They were made out of logs. They spent most of their times outside workind.

Related questions

What are some houses made out of in Ireland?

Most houses in Ireland are made of brick or stone. Some are made of wood.


What were houses made out of in 1800?

Wood, stone and bricks for the most part.


What were houses in Pompeii made of?

Most of the houses or buildings in Pompeii were made of stone


Did Incas live in any other houses besides stone?

Yes, they actually did. Most times incas lived in houses made of straw, grass, mud, and clay. The stone buildings were usually reserved for important buildings or rich houses because they were had to build.


What were houses built out of in the time of Jesus?

Most houses were built of brick burned or dried in the sun. Some were made of limestone and sandstone. Mortar was made from clay, lime, or gypsum, and asphalate. Beams, doorposts, doors, and windows were commonly made from the sycamore tree. Some houses were whitewashed others left plain. The roofs were mainly flat covered with tiles or stone and some with mud.


What where vikings everyday life?

Most people lived on farms. Their houses were made out of wood, stone or blocks of turf, with thatched or turf roofs.


When the inuit people lived in houses what were they made out of?

most houses were made out of wood and carvings


In Ireland what do they use to make houses with?

Most houses are made of bricks and some are made of timber.


Did roman houses have carpet?

No, most Roman houses were stone floors, however some could afford a mosaic floor, but not carpets.


Are most of the houses in japan made of wood?

no they are made of your mom


What solid are most of houses made of?

brick


What were peasant cottages made from?

People make houses from whatever is the most common material around them. In some places, this is wood, while in others, it would be stone or even dried mud.