Stem cells themselves are not controversial. There are different types of stem cells. Hematopoietic stem cells are the building blocks of blood. They are found in bone marrow and umbilical cord blood. They are currently used successfully to treat a number of different diseases. These are not controversial at all. Embryonic stem cells are controversial because they are obtained from embryos. Some people believe that using embryos to produce stem cells is unethical.
The 'embryos' the anti-stem cell voice talk about contain about 75 - 200 cells, and are known as blastocytes. The cells are undifferentiated, meaning they as yet have no purpose. The Pro-Life movement refer to this collection of cells as a human being about 2-4 days after fertilization.
Blastocytes are the best source of undifferentiated stem cells, and those used would be the excess discarded after IVF. They would generally be destroyed - why not use them to save human life? For Pro-Life- destroy these 'embryos' or use them to save life? Please explain your stance!
The controversy over stem cells results from the fact that the human embryo is a convenient source (although not the only source) of stem cells; therefore, this connects to the very controversial issue of abortion. In order to use an embryo as a source of stem cells, it first has to be aborted.
Stem cells aren't controversial, stem cell research is. See related link for the answer to why stem-cell research is controversial.
The most likely reason stem cell research is controversial is the debate between religion and science on when life begins.
This type of research requires that cells are taken from an embryo. Some people are opposed to stem cell research because they think it is unethical.
Stem cell research came along which was impossible to occur without cell discovery.
what would happen if you had a cell in water and molecules were in the cell and some were out of the cell what would most likely happen after a period of time?
There is no solution to stem cell research. It is hotly and highly debated. There are a number of ethical and moral concerns. This will not be resolved any time soon.
mitochondria
Stem Cell Research is very controversial in today's society. Stem Cell Research is known to help people with many illnesses, the research will help the economy stay steady as far as health and medicine, because people will be looking for and willing to pay for help.Ê
Human embryonic stem cell research is controversial because the arguments for it andsagainst it both involve ethical issues of life and death.
Stem cell research is legal in the United States, Finland, Greece, the Netherlands, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. It's illegal in Austria, Denmark, France, Germany, and Ireland. It remains a highly controversial subject.
Investigación de células madre embrionarias. I've been reading about stem cells, the controversial topics are the most interesting.
Stem cells are 'cells with no specialization', they can become almost any kind of cell, including a tumor. However, stem cell research is directed to the regeneration of cells in dysfunctional but constitutionally normal tissues and organs and therefore are not likely to form tumors.
Experimental Cell Research was created in 1950.
The primary reason and most important reason is that some people are scientifically illiterate. They don't understand the science behind the research and they do not have even the basic education to begin to understand it. They don't even try to understand it and they let others try to explain it to them but those people often have some sort of agenda. Science itself is not good or bad, it is what is done with it. If all of society doesn't what to use this knowledge, a least we all have made the decision not just a handful. There are two methods of stem cell research. 1. Embryonic stem cell and 2. Adult stem cell. There is not somuch opposition of manipulating the stem cells from adult cells. On the other hand, Embryonic stem cell research involves the value of life. Thus the main issue for embryonic stem cell research is whether potential embryonic life should be treated with honor and human dignity. Which itself is only a religious viewpoint and not science fact.
Well, there are controversial views with regards to stem cell research. Some would say that stem cell research is important as it has the potential to save many lives and greatly improve our medical knowledge. However, many would argue that it is 'playing God' and that we should not be using stem cells, as it is not natural - not how things were meant to be.
If you ask ten people this question you will get ten different answers on the subject. This is a very controversial area. There is much information to be found on stem cell research. Depending on which resource that you use some say that it is safe and some are totally against it. It seems that people are either totally for it (think its safe) or people are totally against it (not safe).
Constitutionalists just stemmed cell research? Nonsense.
OrthoCAD Network Research Cell was created in 2007.
Stem cell research is very controversal currently in America. The CERN Particle accelerator which is studying quantum particles is also controversal due to experimenting with the unknown and what some people think could be the consequences of their research (such as forming a black hole). Genetic engineering and gene screening of embryos are also controversal.