they can only reproduce in a host cell
They don't meet some of the requirements of a fully living organism.
They do not have DNA, only RNA.
They don't consume or excrete.
They cannot reproduce, either sexually or asexually without infecting a host, and hi-jacking its cell(s) to manufacture new virus.
There are some broader definitions of life which include the viruses as a different sort of life form.
However, for the definition of life that says that living things have their own metabolism excludes viruses. Viruses don't have their own metabolism, which makes them obligaroty parasites. They can't even reproduce without the metabolism of a cell they infect.
They cannot use energy
They cannot live outside of a host.
No
No, viruses are nonliving.
because they gain the 7 characteristics only when they enter a body and they don't have a proper cell structure.
No. Prions are neither prokaryotic nor eukaryotic. They are similar to viruses - nonliving. However, they are more "nonliving" than viruses in the respect that they are just protein sans nucleic acid or anything cell-like.
Living. Because viruses are caused by germs...which are living organisms
False; they are not made up of cells.
No, viruses are nonliving.
They are Different because Viruses are nonliving.
Active (non-killed) viruses are living organisms.
Since viruses are nonliving, they have no known predators.
If you mean what are viruses then they are nonliving strands Rna surrounded by a protein coat
None. They are nonliving organisms.
because they gain the 7 characteristics only when they enter a body and they don't have a proper cell structure.
viruses are nonliving things. but they need living things to reproduces. so live
Hapyy birthday to you
Viruses.
They cannot live outside of a host.
No. Prions are neither prokaryotic nor eukaryotic. They are similar to viruses - nonliving. However, they are more "nonliving" than viruses in the respect that they are just protein sans nucleic acid or anything cell-like.