This puzzled me for ages...... then I found this:
Dear J.:
There's nothing I'd enjoy more than humiliating the two overrated institutions you mention, but I'm afraid you're the only target in range at the moment. "Corn" comes from the Latin word for grain (granum), and through the ages it's been used indiscriminately for whatever grain happens to predominate in a particular region.
In England, for example, corn is the word the natives apply to wheat. Up country a bit, in Scotland, the locals say "corn" when they mean "oats." Naturally, when our British forebears jumped off the Mayflower and found the welcoming committee brandishing long green stalks with funny yellow things pointing out of them, "corn" was the first word that came to mind, and the name stuck in American English.
"Indian corn," as the plant is called now and then, is a more logical and precise name (at least if you're willing to be tolerant about the "Indian" part). Better yet is "maize," the term used by thinking botanists and by English-speaking peoples outside the Americas, where the word "corn" is already spoken for.
Maize is, of course, a product of the New World. No historical evidence suggests that any European had encountered it before Christopher Columbus landed in Cuba. According to Columbus's journal for that fateful day, November 5, 1492, two Spanish scouts he had sent to explore the interior of the island came back with wild tales of "a sort of grain . . . which was well tasted, baked, dried, and made into flour." The natives, in their Taino dialect, called it mahiz, which Columbus promptly corrupted into maiz or maize.
So, getting back to Claudius, he was really expanding the harbor to accommodate more wheat, thus upping the pasta supply. Claudius would have called it granum, and the BBC scriptwriters' rendering, "corn," becomes confusing when the program is shipped over for American consumption. An even more confusing episode occurs in the Masterpiece Theater debasement of Anna Karenina: two characters are standing in the middle of what is manifestly a wheat field, making casual references to the sea of "corn" that surrounds them. If PBS is going to insist on importing all their blockbusters from England, maybe they ought to consider adding subtitles.
- Cecil Adams
and it was on the related link below.
It is more grown because farmers need it for money to make a bread and cereal and others things. It is also most grown because it grows best in the Midwest and it is easiest to grow and it is most common with seeds.
Cornfield and wheatfield, respectively.
Just remember that the word "corn" has different meanings across the world.
No. Wheat farming is and can be located where corn is being farmed, just in different fields from that of the corn field.
stare at fields of corn. stare at fields of wheat. watch a train pull out of a station.
Corn and wheat
Growing one crop over a wide area. Examples are apple orchards, vineyards, wheat fields, corn fields, pumpkin patches.
Beacause it holds the most number of wheat fields
a sickle was the main tool used by medieval farmers to cut down wheat and corn
They grew LOTS of wheat and corn.
Wheat, corn, and soybean, (technically corn and soybeans are not grains so rice and oats would be next).
Wheat, corn, milo (also known as sorghum), soy beans, sunflowers. Thanks for asking!
No. Corn is not used for any other cereal crops like wheat, oat and rye. Corn is used for corn, wheat is used for wheat, etc.
A bundle of wheat is called a sheaf. The plural is sheaves.
I'm sorry if this doesn't answer your answer completely but I'm looking for the same thing. so far I've only found corn and cabbage. They also had wheat and flour. they had beans and corn. That's all I know.