We learn it cause C++ are useful in programming. It is a language in programming.
*********************************
Personally I like C better, there is much less code and fewer opportunities stuff up. C usually produces smaller programs that run faster.
C++ tends to hide things from the programmer (you don't need to know approach) that makes debugging more challenging.
Yes. Indeed, it is recommended that you learn C++ before learning C.
No!!!! You do not need to learn c++ for learning java!
C++ is a superset of C, with some things changed, so it is more correct to say that learning C is easier than learning C++.
No. C++ is an extension of C. By the time you learn C++, you have learned C.
Not without learning and practising.
See related links.
By learning how to program on C+.
C++, but it's always worth learning both, if only to better understand the machine code you create with C++.
Ease of use (after the learning curve, of course), performance and efficient use of memory.
Learning C before C++ may be considered beneficial, as the concepts in C++ expound upon the concepts of C. However, it is unnecessary to learn C, as virtually any C++ course or resource will include all of the fundamentals that were inherited from C. Also, some concepts in C changed in C++ (to better methods), so learning C first will cause the learner to have to change some of their habits when they move to C++. For example, in C you would exclusively use printf for outputting to a screen, while in C++, you would want to use stream classes, so there would be some unnecessary learning.
Buy a beginner's book on the subject. Some, such as a 'SAMS Learn C++ In 24 Hours', also provide a generic C++ implementation and simple IDE to get you started.
b+b+b+c+c+c+c =3b+4c