There is no logical reason to believe in any religion if there is no evidence. The debates between religions themselves, and religions vs. Atheism are all about evidence. People who believe in a religion should do so based on the evidence, and many evidences of God, Creation etc. have been given and are currently being debated. What you believe will be determined on how you interpret the evidence for and against any given religion. The real challenge is to do unbiased research, looking at the evidence without any presuppositions, so you can properly assess the evidence.
Many religions have been changed overtime by scientific facts either supporting them or proving them wrong. For example, many scientists believe and support the hypothesis of evolution. Proven evidence may change the way someone looks on their own religion. If scientists found the holy grail and all other sorts of artifacts people would believe in Christianity more because of the evidence supporting it.
what are supporting evidence of the whyldam resort?
Yes, they believe in fighting for their religion but only if:attacked or oppressed against their religion by others , and/orcalled for supporting others who are under attack or who oppressed against their religion.See related questions below for more information.
There is limited scientific evidence supporting the effectiveness of amber for pain relief. Some people believe that wearing amber jewelry can help reduce pain and inflammation, but more research is needed to confirm these claims.
As a scientist, Richard Dawkins is strongly of the opinion that ones beliefs should be based on evidence of what is true, and that to believe something without evidence is foolhardy and dangerous. He sees religion as the epitome of belief without evidence, and as such feels a duty to denounce it.
No, to be charged for a crime in the court of law there has to be supporting evidence.
According to Charles Darwin and evidence supporting, Yes, but this is a widely controversial topic as it butts heads with religion occasionally.
They believe many different things; what they believe will depend on the specific religion.A religion is usually about having some kind of supernatural belief, in things for which there is no good evidence, or insufficient evidence - for example, most religions believe in a god, or gods. Some religions don't believe in a god, but do believe in other supernatural things.
It doesn't ether you can believe all of the scientific evidence that has been collected over the years or you can believe all of this superstitious crud.
I am Muslim and in our religion we do believe in ghosts as "Gin" they do exist and we do believe in them. It is in our religion.
England was supporting the Netherlands and had the "audacity" to reject Catholicism as an official religion (supporting Protestantism).
We are never obligated to trust our emotions, even withclear supporting evidence. However, it seems we often do trust our emotions even when that is contrary to clear supporting evidence that we should not.