0
In ancient Rome and medieval times 8 was commonly written as IIX thus using less than VIII in the same way that 9 is now IX instead of VIIII
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What does iix mean in roman numerals?
IIX means 8.For the Time, 8.
Can 8 be typed IIX in roman numerals?
Yes. Eight can be written as VIII or IIX when writing in Roman numerals, though the former is more commonly used. According to Wikipedia IIX was used more commonly during the middle ages, though still rarer than VIII.
LWhat is 8 8 1981 in roman numerals?
8 8 1981 in Roman numerals is VIII VIII MDCCCCLXXXI or IIX IIX XXMMI. Note that 1981 is not MCMLXXXI in Roman numerals.
Why it is not correct to write IIX?
Tradionally 8 is represented as VIII in Roman numerals but in parts of Spain 8 is given as IIX so therefore both formats are acceptable.
What is the roman numeral llx?
LLX and IIX both aren't roman numerals. L is 50. LL would be 100 but C is 100. IIX would be 8 but VIII is 8.
What does iix mean in roman numerals?
IIX means 8.For the Time, 8.
Can 8 be typed IIX in roman numerals?
Yes. Eight can be written as VIII or IIX when writing in Roman numerals, though the former is more commonly used. According to Wikipedia IIX was used more commonly during the middle ages, though still rarer than VIII.
LWhat is 8 8 1981 in roman numerals?
8 8 1981 in Roman numerals is VIII VIII MDCCCCLXXXI or IIX IIX XXMMI. Note that 1981 is not MCMLXXXI in Roman numerals.
Why it is not correct to write IIX?
Tradionally 8 is represented as VIII in Roman numerals but in parts of Spain 8 is given as IIX so therefore both formats are acceptable.
What is the roman numeral llx?
LLX and IIX both aren't roman numerals. L is 50. LL would be 100 but C is 100. IIX would be 8 but VIII is 8.
What are the roman numerals for 8-2-2007?
IIX - II - MMVII
What number is II XMM IIX in roman numerals?
During the Roman era the equivalent of 2-1990-8 was probably II-XMM-IIX. But in today's revised notation of Roman numerals 2-1990-8 is written out as II-MCMXC-VIII. The former notation of Roman numerals seems more plausible than the latter.
What does iix represent in roman numerals?
That is not a correctly formed Roman Numeral. It could be meant to be an 8.
What does Roman numeral IIX stand for?
There are many methods to representing Roman Numerals. The one you have written is an alternate form of expressing the value for 8. Although the commonly accepted modern method would be shown as VIII, IIX is a valid representation of Roman Numerals and historically was often used as well - and is therefore accurate. In simpler terms, it's the symbol for the number 8.
Is iix also correct as eight?
Yes it is correct because it will equal to x=10 minus ii =2 equals to 8
Why is eight not written as iix in roman numerals?
In ancient Rome the equivalent of 8 was IIX thus using less numerals or VIII in the same way that 9 was IX or VIIII. But in the Middle Ages the rules governing the Roman numeral system were changed to how we still use them today as for example we would convert 1999 into Roman numerals as MCMXCIX but the Romans probably wrote it out simply as IMM (2000-1)
Roman numeral for eight?
The Roman numeral for 8 is VIII V being 5, and III being 3. Each I standing in the place of a 1. There is an often made mistake that 8 is IIX. This is incorrect.
