Nuclear fusion rocket technology is too expensive to use as a means for power production.
Rockets don't use nuclear fusion so far. The only "practical" use of fusion energy so far is the hydrogen bomb. A controlled reaction has not been possible - at least, not in a way that is economically viable.
Some include radar, computer technology, jet propulsion, medecal advances, rocket technology, weather data collection and reporting, nuclear technology and the list goes on.
W. H. Robbins has written: 'An historical perspective of the NERVA nuclear rocket engine technology program' -- subject(s): Rocket engines
HMMM. computers, the internet, electron microscope, nuclear technology (DEBATABLE!), the rocket ->> Satellites.
The Production Budget for Message in a Bottle was $30,000,000.
That rocket has NUCLEAR POWER!?
A rocket or unmanned airplane with one or more nuclear warheads as its payload.
No. A nuclear missile is a rocket of some kind with an atomic/nuclear bomb as its warhead.
I believe the fastest technology is the rocket. Or a Porsche if you're really picky.
it means that either a nuclear rocket or a nuclear lab has exploded letting out nuclear waste and radiation which means the city would have to be evacuated until they are out of the nuclear radation zone.
Richard Feynman
nerva means Nuclear Engine for Rocket Vehicle Application