Want this question answered?
The anti federalists said the constitution was an illegal document because they said that the delegates had only been authorized to repair the articles of confederation, not make a new document, so it was not a legal document.
it was considered illegal by some because the U.S. Constitution at the time did not contain any provisions for acquiring new territory.
Nothing in any founding document protects them and they are groups that cause problems. However, they are not illegal until there is a law that specifically says they are outlawed.
it was considered illegal by some because the U.S. Constitution at the time did not contain any provisions for acquiring new territory.
Do you mean is it an amendment to the Constitution? No, it was not an Amendment to the Constitution. The 13th Amendment was passed in 1865, after the Civil War ended to make slavery illegal. The Emancipation Proclamation was delivered early in 1863.
The anti federalists said the constitution was an illegal document because they said that the delegates had only been authorized to repair the articles of confederation, not make a new document, so it was not a legal document.
The Constitution was originally intended to amend the Articles of Confederation and the framers decided to replace it. It would be considered illegal because the Articles required all of the states to ratify amendments and the Constitution only required nine of 13.
Article 1, Section 10, Paragraph 1 of the Constitution can be interpreted as it being illegal to secede from the Union.
You might be referring to a Bill of Attainder, which is precluded by Constitution Article I, Section 9.
The Espionage and Sedition Acts (1917-1918) *Wartime Only*
No.
Clause 3 of Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution forbids the federal government from passing EX POST FACTO laws, and Clause 1 of Article I, Section 10, forbids state governments from doing the same.
You don’t, it is illegal to alter a government document and is considered fraud.
It is basically saying that it is illegal to deny a person the right to travel except when national security, public safety, or public health is at risk.
Article Nine of the Japanese constitution explicitly forbids Japan from maintaining a military or using force internationally for any reason.
No.
No, but it should be. It is illegal if the seller tells you it is the genuine article.