They didnt want to pay taxes on their tea and items. They didnt want to be ruled by the king.
~wiki answers official
Because it was Too Expensive And They Didt want To Pay Extra
Yes, Gandhi did encourage Indians to NOT buy British goods because it was too expensive in the olden days when India was under the British rule.
Another way instead of the Boston Tea Party that colonists might have done to protest the Tea Act was not buying the British tea. If many colonists didn't buy tea from Britain or just stop drinking it then the British wouldn't be making a profit from that sale and this would anger them because they need money. Maybe the British would lower the prices or make a compromise with the colonies.
The British said they would stop colonists from settling in the west
the colonists the colonists were inexperienced and didnt have the best weapons or training The brits had the complete opposite, good training and great weapons. After a long time of fighting the colonists still won
The American colonies refused to submit to the Intolerable Acts of 1774. The Continental Association was formed to boycott British goods, and the colonies pledged to support Massachusetts if they were occupied by the British. A plan to stop exports to Britain after a year was never implemented, because open warfare erupted at Concord and Lexington just five months later in April, 1775.the Boston tea partyColonists grew increasingly angry and began the Revolutionary War.Americans from all colonies reacted by trying to help the people of Boston.
They would stop trade with all british. They destroyed british goods in the colonies. They basically rebeled.Vowed to not imprt British goods.
They would stop buying sugar , molasses, and other sweetened goods.
The British government tried to stop American colonists from smuggling with the Sugar Act.
Yes, Gandhi did encourage Indians to NOT buy British goods because it was too expensive in the olden days when India was under the British rule.
Boycott
boycott
Embargo
Boycott
No they can't.
Another way instead of the Boston Tea Party that colonists might have done to protest the Tea Act was not buying the British tea. If many colonists didn't buy tea from Britain or just stop drinking it then the British wouldn't be making a profit from that sale and this would anger them because they need money. Maybe the British would lower the prices or make a compromise with the colonies.
because the british got fed up with the colinest and yeah bynote from new answerer: the British DID NOT get fed up with the Colonists. The colonists got fed up with the british. Because of said reasons belowNew Answer: February 11, 20091.) Because the British kept giving taxes to the Colonists. They treated the Colonists like a "money tree". So everytime the British needed money, they just took some from the Colonists.2.) Colonists began smuggling in sugar3.) The British had the Stamp Act and the Sugar Act.STAMP ACT = every written document now had a taxSUGAR ACT = this was to stop colonists from smuggling goods (mostly and other foods)4.) Eventually, the Colonists got really pissed off.
This was the Sugar Act.