There were a few reasons why the British troops continued to fight during World War 1. As a member of the armed forced deserting your post, absconding, or refusing to fight was punishable by firing squad. Death by firing squad as a coward was a huge dishonour to his family and even the town he came from. Notwithstanding this, during the 14-18 war there was a wave of national pride in being British. Many of the earlier troops were composed of so called "Pals battalion" (a combat unit of 500to 800 soldiers). These were comprised entirely of soldiers who were volunteers recruited at a specific recruiting drive. These men were proud to be defending the honour of the British Empire against the "Hun" (The German troops). During the early years of the war losses by cowardice was few and far between, but as the full Horror of trench warfare and the invention of the machine gun and mechanised warfare took hold the issue of desertion became more of an issue for the Generals running the war. They are the 306 young men - four of them just 17 who were shot for cowardice during the First World War, but when you put this into perspective of over 37 million: over 16 million deaths and 20 million wounded it pales into insignificance. The pain for the families exists to this day, and recently there has been campaigns for these men to be posthumously pardoned.
All of them - that is not helpful!
There is no answer to that question as there were thousands of soldiers in WW1 but don't know how many in trenches. Plus it depends if you ment British soldiers or soldiers as a generally.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland lost 885,000 soldiers to World War 1. The total for all British Imperial Forces was 1.1 million. Different 'official' publications from the British government provide conflicting statistics.
Yes!
Australia, in the first world war had soldiers sent to gallipoli to create a diversion for the british troops. the australians fought against the Turks in turkey. Later, the soldiers were withdrawn and taken to the western front where they helped the English fight against the Germans and the hungarians. Australia, in the first world war had soldiers sent to gallipoli to create a diversion for the british troops. the australians fought against the Turks in turkey. Later, the soldiers were withdrawn and taken to the western front where they helped the English fight against the Germans and the hungarians.
All of them - that is not helpful!
Approximately there is 37968 hours in ww1.
There is no answer to that question as there were thousands of soldiers in WW1 but don't know how many in trenches. Plus it depends if you ment British soldiers or soldiers as a generally.
Like most British, French and American soldiers in World War 1, most fought in France against Germany. There was almost no fighting in Germany itself.
Ireland had the largest Volunteer Force in WW1, Irish soldiers fought for the British army and were promised Independence for doing so, which the British later renaged on. Ireland lost over 50,000 soldiers in WW1 fighting under poor British commanders from upper class backgrounds with extremely limited military knowledge and experience. Many Irish volunteers also fought for other Armys such as Canada and the US.
there were 5,397,000 british soldiers mobilised during ww1.
German officer on British soldiers in the World War 1 Lions Led by Donkeys....... British troops & the General Staff WW1
Yes, the british were based in yemen during WW1 to protect the aden colony from the Ottomen Turks.
It was terrible, spending all your time either in a dirty trench with rats or up on the front line fighting for your country.
Many soldiers of Australia used British equipment, most notably the Lee Enfield which was the British standard issue rifle of the time
2 things in particular enable WW1 to happen in the way that it did: the Railway & canned food.
The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland lost 885,000 soldiers to World War 1. The total for all British Imperial Forces was 1.1 million. Different 'official' publications from the British government provide conflicting statistics.