answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did Dred Scott believe that he should be free?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

What did Sojourner Truth believe in?

She believed that slaves should be set free, also non-violent actions.


Why does conflict exist?

Because, people, in general, have too much free time. Or, more likely, people believe that there are positions and truths which should not be readily ceded to others.


Do you believe in fate or free will?

Some people believe that everything is already destined to occur and that free will is an illusion (determinism and predeterminism); other people believe free will exists and that people have control over their own fates. Among these two dichotomous position lies a spectrum, varying from hard determinism to philosophical libertarianism. One of the main proponents in the argument that both determinism and free will are valid postulates is the concept of Philosophical Dualism. The answer to whether I (or you) believe in one or another depends on who is asked the question. There is no absolute or finite answer to such a subjective and ambiguous question.


What do free masons believe?

The Freemasons believe in a god who is known as the Great Architect. They do not believe that Jesus is God and their god is different from any other religion. This is one of the most secretive religions of all times.


Does the human will affect human freedom and reason why?

Both human will and human freedom are concepts permeating human belief systems. Neither exist in the non conceptual reality of nature. However, Humans are free to believe in free will to believe in either idea.

Related questions

Who said that he should be free because he lived in a free territory?

Dred Scott.


What did Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on?

Dred Scott based his claim for freedom on the fact that his master had taken him to free states and territories.


What did the Dred Scott Decision did Not do?

First of all learn how to talk. Then go ask Your History teacher this question. you should have said "What did the Dred Scott decision do?" It was a slave who thought he was free and they went to court over it and the court said he was a slave and that he was not free.


Why did dred Scott agrue that he should be free?

because he onced lived in areas of the north where slavery was prohibited


What did Dred Scott base his claim of freedom on?

Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.


What did dred Scott base his claim on freedom on?

Dred Scot's master had taken him to a free territory.


What are facts about dred Scott?

His master unwisely took him into free soil, and then back into slave country. If Dred wanted his freedom, he should have applied for it on free soil, where it would have been granted automatically.


What was the supreme court case that said free soil was unconstitutional because it denied owners their property?

I believe it was called, Dred Scott.


What was the issue in the dred Scott case?

He was a slave in a free state


What describes the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the Dred Scott v. Sandford case?

The Missouri Compromise was illegal; therefore, Dred Scott was free.The Missouri Compromise was legal; therefore, Dred Scott wasn't free.The Missouri Compromise was illegal; therefore, Dred Scott wasn't free.The Missouri Compromise was legal; therefore, Dred Scott was free.


How was dred Scott discriminated?

because they said "slaves are property" and said that the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional and they wanted to keep slaves out of western territory and any slaves found free would be back in captivity and even though Dred Scott was free for 19 years they still made him to be a slave because of the Dred Scott vs. Sanford .That is how Dred Scott was discriminated.


Why did Dred Scott believe he was free?

Because he had once lived on free soil, where his freedom would have been granted automatically, if he had applied for it then. He didn't see why he couldn't apply for it retrospectively.