Transport available to William Wallace were his own feet, a horse, carts, and sailing vessels if he went abroad.
none but his family owned a tennanted farm in Ayrshire
The real William Wallace did not wear a kilt. Historically, kilts weren't even around until the sixteenth century, and William Wallace was born in approximately 1272. I went to Scotland a couple of years ago, and while I was on a bus tour the guide told me William Wallace would have been too poor to have his own kilt, even if they had existed then. He told me that, like most other Scotsmen of that era, he would have worn trousers with a long shirt belted around the waist, or something like that.
The soldiers know for the use of the khukri belong to the Gurkha Regiment. These soldiers are from Nepal not India and form their own regiment in the British Army.
yes. Prince Eward II is William Wallace's child because he had an affair with Princess Isabella the french princess who was married to King Eward I. She had the child a few months after William Wallace's death. The above statement is FALSE. Isabelle of France didn't give birth to Edward II, she was MARRIED TO HIM. Edward I (often referred to as "longshanks") was Father of Edward II, who married the French Princess Isabelle, but not until long after Wallace had been executed and two years after the death of Longshanks. Contrary to "Braveheart", she never met, let alone had a relationship with, either man.
Transport available to William Wallace were his own feet, a horse, carts, and sailing vessels if he went abroad.
none but his family owned a tennanted farm in Ayrshire
After the nobles allowed Frederick William to keep his army, he used his army to control the entire country.
After the nobles allowed Frederick William to keep his army, he used his army to control the entire country.
he had his own army
He used his army to control all of Prussia.
The real William Wallace did not wear a kilt. Historically, kilts weren't even around until the sixteenth century, and William Wallace was born in approximately 1272. I went to Scotland a couple of years ago, and while I was on a bus tour the guide told me William Wallace would have been too poor to have his own kilt, even if they had existed then. He told me that, like most other Scotsmen of that era, he would have worn trousers with a long shirt belted around the waist, or something like that.
There is no historic record that William the Conquerer killed anyone personally with his own hands. At the Battle of Hastings in 1066 William's invading army killed many defenders of England in the army of King Harold.
Difficult question, it really is not know if Wallace was married or not,, even his own birth date is not certain and is quoted as being between 1260 and 1278.. However Marion Braidfute has been suggested.
He used his army to control all of Prussia.
Wallace was executed by Edward I. He was condemned as a traitor, and thus given the normal English punishment meted out to traitors: being hanged, drawn, and quartered. However, unlike most traitors, he was dragged through the streets for hours tied to horses' tails. Hanging, drawing and quartering means being hung with an agonizingly slow rope then the executioner rips out the still-beating heart. He was also castrated at the point of death.
Richard has parted with the clouds to form his own group.... there are groups called the mighty clouds of joy...