The real William Wallace did not wear a kilt. Historically, kilts weren't even around until the sixteenth century, and William Wallace was born in approximately 1272. I went to Scotland a couple of years ago, and while I was on a bus tour the guide told me William Wallace would have been too poor to have his own kilt, even if they had existed then. He told me that, like most other Scotsmen of that era, he would have worn trousers with a long shirt belted around the waist, or something like that.
He would have worn the standard protection everyone with half a mind would have worn, a steel plated suit of armour and chain-mail armour. He never wore a kilt. He may have worn a surcoat over his armour which would have been emblazoned with his coat of arms.
William Wallace was never a king.
William A. Wallace died on 1896-05-22.
William A. Wallace was born on 1827-11-28.
William Wallace's occupation was to be a military officer.
It's traditional for a man to wear a kilt and men are really the only one's who should/are supposed to wear a kilt.
Hardly anyone wears a kilt for normal daily wear
no!
Formal wear is something that is important for all of us. Whether you are looking for the perfect formal or semi-formal
Kilt
kilt
Kilt
Kilt
William Vincent Wallace's birth name is William Vincent Wallace.
He would have worn the standard protection everyone with half a mind would have worn, a steel plated suit of armour and chain-mail armour. He never wore a kilt. He may have worn a surcoat over his armour which would have been emblazoned with his coat of arms.
Because to wear a kilt you have to be a TRUE SCOTSMAN
The simple answer is yes. The pleats of a kilt are meant to be worn in the back.