Want this question answered?
Yes he did. Hamilton supported a looser interpretation of the Constitution so that the central government could be strengthened at the expense of the state's rights. He believe that the government should be allowed to use the implied powers and the elastic clause from the Constitution to his advantage.
Alexander Hamilton did not believe that the Constitution created a strong enough central government, but felt that it was better than the alternative of keeping the Articles of Confederation. There is no evidence that he supported the Constitution for any other reason besides the fact that he felt that it was a better system of government.
The authors of the Federalist Papers (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay) supported the Constitution and wanted to encourage the states to ratify it. James Madison later became less enamored with the instrument, but it had already been ratified and made operational.
The federalist supported the constitution, and the anti-federalist were against the Constitution. I DON'T KNOW THE REST. Go on the Internet for once!
The national government had the obligation to pay the debt.
Yes he did. Hamilton supported a looser interpretation of the Constitution so that the central government could be strengthened at the expense of the state's rights. He believe that the government should be allowed to use the implied powers and the elastic clause from the Constitution to his advantage.
He didn't because he believed in strict construction of he constitution, which led him to believe that anything that is not written clearly in the constitution should not be done. Thus he opposed the creation of the bank because the constitution did not specifically grant power to Congress to create one. Alexander Hamilton favor the bank, because he believed in lose construction of the Constitution, and according to the "Elastic clause", the congress can do whatever that is for the good of the people. Thus Hamilton was for the creation of the national bank.
Alexander Hamilton did not believe that the Constitution created a strong enough central government, but felt that it was better than the alternative of keeping the Articles of Confederation. There is no evidence that he supported the Constitution for any other reason besides the fact that he felt that it was a better system of government.
The authors of the Federalist Papers (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay) supported the Constitution and wanted to encourage the states to ratify it. James Madison later became less enamored with the instrument, but it had already been ratified and made operational.
He believed that if something wasn't forbidden in the constitution, then it was permitted. For example, the United States having a national bank. It wasn't forbidden in the constitution, so he took that as it being okay to have one, it was one of the implied powers of the government.
Hamilton was a Federalist who believed in a country with a strong federal government. For example, he wrote the Public Report on a National Bank, in which he suggested that the national government should create a bank to help get rid of Revolutionary War debt, even though some argued that it was a breach of the Constitution.
NovaNet: It balanced monarchy with republicanism
NovaNet: It balanced monarchy with republicanism
NovaNet: It balanced monarchy with republicanism
NovaNet: It balanced monarchy with republicanism
NovaNet: It balanced monarchy with republicanism
NovaNet: It balanced monarchy with republicanism