answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it aimed to prohibit slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico after the Mexican-American War. They feared it would limit the expansion of slavery into new territories and potentially undermine the balance of power between free and slave states in Congress.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1d ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why did slaveholders oppose the wilmont proviso?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Philosophy

Why did slaveholders oppose the Wilmo proviso?

Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to prohibit slavery in the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War. They saw it as a threat to their way of life and ability to expand slavery into new territories. Additionally, they believed it violated their property rights.


Why would southern planters oppose the wilmot proviso?

Southern planters opposed the Wilmot Proviso because it sought to prohibit slavery in any territory acquired from Mexico, threatening their economic interests and political power. They feared it would upset the delicate balance between free and slave states, potentially leading to the abolition of slavery in the United States.


Why did slaveholders try to convince poor whites that slavery was justfied?

Slaveholders wanted poor whites to feel superior to slaves, so that they would not unite with slaves to challenge the existing power structure. By convincing poor whites that they were better than slaves, slaveholders ensured that their control over slaves remained unchallenged. Additionally, slaveholders sought to maintain social order and stability by preventing potential uprisings or rebellions.


What words reveal Douglass's perspective on or view of slaveholders?

Douglass uses words like "tyrant," "cruel," "inhuman," and "degrading" to describe slaveholders, revealing his view of them as oppressive and immoral individuals who perpetuate the institution of slavery through violence and exploitation.


Why did slaveholders try to convince poor whites that slavery was justified?

needed their political support

Related questions

Why did slaveholders claim the wilmot proviso was unconstitutional?

Slaveholders opposed the Wilmot Proviso because Slaveholders argued that slaves were property by the Constitution


Which party endorsed the wilmont Proviso?

Whig


What did the Wilmot proviso proposed?

Introduced by David Wilmont, the wilmont proviso proposed to ban slavery in any territory gained from, or after the Mexican American War.


How did southerners react to the Wilmont proviso?

they thought it was unfair


Why did slaveholders claim that the Wilmette proviso was unconstitutional?

Slaveholders claimed the Wilmot Proviso was unconstitutional because they argued that it violated the Fifth Amendment rights of slaveholders by depriving them of their property (slaves) without due process of law. They believed that Congress did not have the authority to ban slavery in the territories.


What does the wilmont proviso say?

It declared that there should be no slavery allowed in any of the new territories acquired from Mexico.


What statement is the best description of the wilmont proviso?

Slavery would not be allowed in any territory acqired from the Republic of Mexico.


What was the aim of the wilmont proviso?

to gain political power in both congressional houses for the free states. Wilmont proviso bans slavery of any type in the Mexican cession territories. Those will then be divided up into free states than when entered into the union will give the free states more senators and more reps.


Why did the south oppose the wilmot proviso?

because slaves were property protected by the constitution


How did the wilmont proviso and potential state hood for California deepen the regional divisions?

The Wilmot Proviso declared that none of the newly-acquired Mexican territories should become slave-states. The Abolitionists strongly supported this belief, and it drove the two sides further apart.


What was the significance of the wilmont proviso?

It polarised opinion by declaring that there could be no slavery in any new state or territory. This removed any hope of compromise, and it was the sticking-point in Lincoln's last-minute attempt to avoid a conflict.


Why was the wilmont proviso controversial?

Because it would have forbidden any extension of slavery, and as new states opened up in the West, the slave-states would have been increasingly out-voted when passing new laws in Congress.