Roosevelt got his prize for negotiating a settlement of the war between Japan and Russia. As US President he was prone to use military threats as a tool for international diplomacy and he was nominated for vice-president in large part because of his heroics in the Spanish-American War. In short, he was not known as a man of peace.
preventing a full economic collapse -mE
No, it is not, but you will probably find some people that will argue that it should be.
Some people say hydrogen should be above lithium (Li) and others argue that it should be above fluorine (F) because it has a valence shell that only accepts two electrons.
Of course not. It depends what you argue about though. There is a very fine line between argument and debates. Often people argue about different tastes in things like music when they should just debate it.
to argue against US involvement in Europe
people should disobey unjust laws~apex
People should resist unfair laws.
Guns Don't Argue - 1957 is rated/received certificates of: Finland:(Banned) (1960)
Yeah... People need speed limits to know the correct speed to drive, some people may argue that people will know what speed they should drive at, but what about people who are new?
There are two interpretations of your question: 1. Why does my boyfriend argue with me first and then argue with the people who cause us problems? 2. Why does my boyfriend argue with me rather than with the people who cause us problems? Which is it?
Overpopulation
You can argue that people should have the freedom to purchase whatever legal beverages they want. People are responsible for exercising their own self control by limiting how much soda they drink, but there shouldn't be a ban that limits their freedom to choose what they drink.