There were a lot of loyalists living in the backcountry of Georgia and South Carolina
because the coloniues didnt have what they want and even if they did have what they want....One of the other 13 colonies wouldnt give it to them so thats why the britich chose to attack the southern colonies
because their was gold on their land
They might act badly, and team up and start a war against the British.
the loyalist were people that kept loyal to the king. fought against the rebels (patriots ),because they didnt want great Britain to have independence. the patriots won the independence from the loyalist.
It's a little late to decide that, isn't it? There haven't been either Patriots or Loyalists since the end of the Revolution in the 1780s. If I lieved at that time, I might be a Loyalist if I wanted to remain part of the British Empire and I would be a Patriot if I didn't.
The British would have maintained control of the colonies and the people who have signed the Declaration of Independence would've been executed for treason, although we would've proabably tried again later.
Great Britain and the colonists had a hostile relationship after the Revolutionary War. After the war, the colonies may or may not have trust issues with the British. However, the British and the colonists probably had discomfort with each other.
There were a lot of loyalists living in the backcountry of Georgia and South Carolina
They loyalists were largely persecuted by the "Sons of Liberty" during the beginnings and during the Revolutionary War. Their allegiance to the Crown and British Government was targeted by rioters and assemblies of citizens protesting the Kings policies towards the colonies. After the war ended, the British Soldiers took as many loyalists as they could with them to Canada. If they would have stayed, some might have been executed for treason by the unruly crowds.
The purpose was to start a way to send information easier through out the colonies of early America. A group of officials, or delegates, from each colony came to meet and form the Committees of Correspondence. In this organization, delegates wrote letters and sent them to the other colonies on horseback so the information traveled around the colonies faster. Why should they do this? They did this because information about what the British was doing could travel to the other colonies fast. This way if the British were doing bad things the other colonies knew about it and could tell everyone in the colonies what the British were doing and that the colonies should unite and be independent. The loyalists, the colonists loyal to the king of England, could then decide to become patriots, the colonists wanting independence. The delegates hoped that sending information to the other colonies would lead loyalists into changing sides and supporting freedom for the colonies. The Committees of Correspondence either worked or did not work, I do not know, but i do know that the information did travel fast but it might not have worked with the loyalists. Hope you understand now.
Loyalists would then become either Patriots or they might not even bother to be on any side. This would defiantly make a big difference in the war. The Americans then would have more people to join their army in the fight against the British.
NO, they didnt but some called loyalists who where loyal to the British might have attacked the patriots.
the southern colonies' cash crops required a great deal of difficult work to grow and harvest.
It's a little late to decide that, isn't it? There haven't been either Patriots or Loyalists since the end of the Revolution in the 1780s. If I lieved at that time, I might be a Loyalist if I wanted to remain part of the British Empire and I would be a Patriot if I didn't.
Lucy would have let the Southerners walk all over her.
They might act badly, and team up and start a war against the British.
A British colonial official may defend British action toward the American colonies in the years just before the Revolution. They may use the argument that the colonists were traitors.
The British southern strategy ultimately failed for several reasons. For example, General Henry Clinton upset many people in the south who might have been loyal to the crown.
the southern colonies' cash crops required a great deal of difficult work to grow and harvest.