They were afraid of any system of government in which a person, or a small group of people could make the rules and take over. They wanted a strong central government in which the powers would not be so strong as to take away the rights of states or individuals. To keep a small group or an individual from taking those steps they adopted a system of checks and balances they felt would prevent that.
So that one person or branch had too much power. That's why they fought for their freedom from Britain.
they didn't want any one person or branch of government to have to much power.
a strong central government
I believe this would be referred to as a division of power and a checks and balances system.
It's called the separation of powers.
Dividing the power was crucial to a proper balance, and to the protection of the freedoms of the citizenry. Currently we see the Executive branch in the US creating law out of thin air, radically changing that balance for the worst. Executive orders are one example of this. With any one branch in complete control, the checks and balances that were so carefully crafted are lost.
The three-way division of power among the branches of the federal government is known as a system of checks and balances. The three divisions are the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.
Checks and Balances ...no it separation of powers ~nova Net
"Division of powers" or, more generally, "checks and balances."
The Texas constitution emphasizes its responsibility to provide for its own needs and its own citizens. Specifically it asserts its freedom to do this independent of the regulations of the federal government. This is the main principle of federalism.
The division of power in the U. S. political system contributes to limited government in a great way. Due to how our founding father's set up the constitution it allows the government to work for the people and not to control the people.
a strong central government
Yes, because there was a political division between the Federalists and Antifederalists as to whether the Constitution should be passed or not. Federalists supported the Constitution and Antifederalists opposed the Constitution.
One synonym for the division of powers is known as the system of checks and balances. It is the way the government of the United States is set up.
seventeen division
Manchester utd Chelsea reading bury..........
The founding fathers of our country were very wary when they wrote the Constitution because of the terrible experience they had under the reign of the king in England. Therefore, they took their time and thought out an all encompassing, timeless piece which covered every aspect of the life they hated in England. The basic principles the Constitution advocates are federalism, limited government, separation of powers, popular sovereignty, judicial review, and checks and balances.
1. Checks & Balances 2. Separation of Powers 3. Federalism
Checks and balances