0
Why did the US Supreme Court not order James Madison to deliver Marbury's commission letter to him?
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
Marshall declined to issue a writ of mandamus ordering Madison to deliver Marbury's (and the other plaintiffs') commissions ostensibly because the Chief Justice declared the Court lacked constitutional authority to do so.
In reality, Marshall had issued a "show cause" order in December 1801, a preliminary step to issuing a writ of mandamus, that Madison ignored. Marshall could reasonably assume Madison would also ignore a writ of mandamus, a move that would weaken the Judicial branch's authority in government. Since Marshall's goal was to strengthen the Judicial branch, he knew ordering delivery of the commissions was out of the question, and devised what appeared to be a deliberate political strategy to enhance the power of the Court without creating conflict between the three branches of government or the warring Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Who did William Marbury try to get his commission from?
In Marbury v Madison, 5 US 137 (1803), William Marbury tried to get James Madison to deliver his commission. James Madison, who later became a US President, was Secretary of State under President Thomas Jefferson at the time.
Why is William marbury significant?
William Marbury is significant in the annals of history because it was his commission that John Adams failed to deliver on time and James Madison refused to sign. This led to the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison, in which John Marshall first put forth the idea of judicial review.
If the Supreme Court decided that Marbury was entitled to his commission how could it be sure that the Executive branch would deliver it?
They couldn't; that created a significant dilemma for Chief Justice John Marshall.The Supreme Court has no enforcement power over its decisions, so there was no way they could compel Madison to deliver Marbury's commission, which may be one reason Marshall denied the Court had original jurisdiction over the matter. If the Court issued the requested writ of mandamus, and Madison refused to comply (a theory tested when Madison refused to answer the Court's inquiry as to why it should not issue a writ for the commission), it would weaken the power of the Judicial branch.When a Court decision involves a question of documented law, the courts generally make a ruling, then remand the case back to the Circuit Court (US Court of Appeals) or state supreme court to ensure the decision is carried out. Otherwise, only respect for the Court and established protocol encourages compliance.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
What was the Chief Justice Marshall's decision in the case of Marbury v.Madison?
The Court through Chief Justice Marshall unanimously decided not to require Madison to deliver the commission to Marbury.
What was William marburys case?
Marbury v. Madison, case decided in 1803 by the U.S. Supreme Court. William Marbury had been commissioned justice of the peace in the District of Columbia by President John Adams in the "midnight appointments" at the very end of his administration. When the new administration did not deliver the commission, Marbury sued James Madison, Jefferson's Secretary of State. (At that time the Secretary of State was charged with certain domestic duties as well as with conducting foreign affairs.) Chief Justice John Marshall held that, although Marbury was entitled to the commission, the statute that was the basis of the particular remedy sought was unconstitutional because it gave the Supreme Court authority that was implicitly denied it by Article 3 of the U.S. Constitution. The decision was the first by the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional and void an act passed by Congress that the Court considered in violation of the Constitution. The decision established the doctrine of judicial review, which recognizes the authority of courts to declare statutes unconstitutional.See R. L. Clinton, Marbury v. Madison and Judicial Review (1989).The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2007, Columbia University Press. All rights reserved
What was the supreme case of Mar bury and Madison?
Marbury v. Madison, case decided in 1803 by the U.S. Supreme Court. William Marbury had been commissioned justice of the peace in the District of Columbia by President John Adams in the "midnight appointments" at the very end of his administration. When the new administration did not deliver the commission, Marbury sued James Madison, Jefferson's Secretary of State. (At that time the Secretary of State was charged with certain domestic duties as well as with conducting foreign affairs.) Chief Justice John Marshall held that, although Marbury was entitled to the commission, the statute that was the basis of the particular remedy sought was unconstitutional because it gave the Supreme Court authority that was implicitly denied it by Article 3 of the U.S. Constitution. The decision was the first by the Supreme Court to declare unconstitutional and void an act passed by Congress that the Court considered in violation of the Constitution. The decision established the doctrine of judicial review, which recognizes the authority of courts to declare statutes unconstitutional.
Who delivered the Supreme Court decision?
Cushing and Moore took no part in the consideration or decision of the case. ... The case resulted from a petition to the Supreme Court by William Marbury, who ... the Supreme Court to force the new Secretary of State James Madison to deliver.
Who failed to deliver Marbury's commission on time and who wrote the US Supreme Court decision against Marbury?
John Marshall, who was Secretary of State under the second US President, John Adams, was unable to deliver all 42 new justice of the peace commissions established under the recent Organic Act of 1801 before Adams left office, because Adams signed and sealed the appointments on the last day of his Presidency (the men later became known as the "Midnight Judges" for his last-minute action).Marshall, who had recently been appointed Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, assumed his replacement, James Madison, would complete the task. Madison, however, was a member of the Democratic-Republican party, as was the incoming President, Thomas Jefferson. Adams was a member of the Federalist party, and all the appointments had been made to members of his own party. When Jefferson discovered there were undelivered commissions, he reduced the number of commissions by 12, nominated Democratic-Republicans to five of the positions, and allowed Madison to arrange delivery of the rest.William Marbury was one of the twelve whose commission was eliminated, so he filed a motion in the US Supreme Court requesting a writ of mandamus be issued against James Madison, forcing him to deliver the commission Marbury needed to take office.John Marshall wrote the opinion in the Marbury v. Madison(1803) case that attempted to resolve both the disposition of the judicial appointments, and the right of the court to issue a writ of mandamus (an order requiring Madison to take an official action) to Madison, compelling him to deliver the paperwork.The decision was actually in favor of Marbury, in that the Court determined he was entitled to his position; however, they also ruled that part of the Judicial Act of 1789, which gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction over such matters, was unconstitutional because Congress had improperly assigned the Supreme Court a role not prescribed by the Constitution.Marshall said the Supreme Court only had appellate authority over the Marbury issue, and that the case would have to be tried in the lower courts and exhaust its lower-court appeals before the Supreme Court could review the case.Marbury v. Madison is one of the most important landmark cases in Supreme Court history, because the Court interpreted the Constitution to give them the power of judicial review over legislation created by Congress and the Executive branch, and to overturn legislation they considered to be unconstitutional.For more in-depth information about this case, see Related Links, below.
How did Marbury v. Madison establish the precedent of judicial review?
Marbury v. Madison, (1803) is often cited as the case that affirmed the Supreme Court's right of judicial review. Marbury is the first case in which the US Supreme Court declared an act of Congress unconstitutional (Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789).Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)For more information, see Related Questions, below.
What did William Marbury want the Supreme Court to do in the case Marbury v Madison?
William Marbury and his fellow plaintiffs wanted the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus (a court order compelling an official to take action) to Secretary of State James Madison, commanding him to deliver the missing commissions so the plaintiffs could take office as justices of the peace.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
When the US Supreme Court heard Marbury vs Madison was it under original jurisdiction or appellate jurisdiction?
The Supreme Court heard the case under original jurisdiction because the Judiciary Act of 1789 assigned to the Court the responsibility for all writs of mandamus. However, John Marshall determined the Constitution hadn't granted the Supreme Court subject matter jurisdiction over Marbury's case, and that the proper initial venue would be federal District Court.Therefore, while the Court determined Marbury was entitled to his commission, they couldn't compel Secretary of State Madison to deliver it. Had Marbury wanted to pursue the matter further, he would have to refile in District Court. If he wasn't granted satisfaction in the lower courts, then the Supreme Court could properly hear his petition under its appellate jurisdiction.Marbury never refiled the case, and never became justice of the peace.Case Citation:Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137 (1803)
Did john marshall deliver a series of the most momentous decisions in American judicial history?
Yes. "During Jefferson's term of office, the power of the Supreme Court was increased. William Marbury, one of the judges appointed by Adams before he left office, had not been granted his commission of office prior to the change of administration. Marbury asked the Supreme Court to compel Secretary of State James Madison to grant him his commission. Chief Justice John Marshall recognized that if he and the justices approved Marbury's request, Madison might not follow the Court's orders, thus weakening the people's respect for the judiciary. If the justices rejected Marbury's request, however, the Republicans would have an apparent victory. Marshall managed to avoid both political pitfalls. In his decision, he stated that Marbury deserved the commission but that the Court was powerless to make the Secretary of State deliver it because of a conflict between the Constitution and the Judiciary Act of 1789. Marshall's decision in Marbury v. Madison was a blow to the Republicans, but it strengthened the federal judiciary by establishing the principle that the Supreme Court could declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. This ruling was the first of many important decisions made by John Marshall during his thirty-five years as Chief Justice." (Switched on Schoolhouse: History Unit 3. The Revolution of 1800)
