Actually, the " colonist" didn't think that. It was a small group of men who were protecting their own economic interest. The British had LOWERED the tax on tea and this made the price of the tea smuggled into the colonies higher than the British. The smugglers were upset and two of the biggest smugglers in the colonies were Hamilton and Hancock. Hancock was very wealthy and he funded/supported the Son's of Liberty. Without him there would have been no Sam Adams nor the Son's of Liberty, but the whole purpose was to protect his economic interests. The people in the colonies paid LESS taxes than people in England paid.
King George the III taxed their tea, so they decided to buy their tea from the Indians instead.
because many colonist thought that the east India company (British tea company) would put them out of business
the tea act allowed the east india trading co (a british company) to have a tax break on selling tea but no tax break for the american merchants selling tea
It gave Britain a tea monopoly
tea act *no, its the Sugar Act*
this website
because many colonist thought that the east India company (British tea company) would put them out of business
" No Taxation without Representation." In 1773, Britain passed the Tea Act. This law gave British company the right to control all trade in tea. The colonist still have to pay tax. This angered colonial merchants and other colonists.
the tea act allowed the east India trading co (a british company) to have a tax break on selling tea but no tax break for the american merchants selling tea
tea merchants
The colonist and the East India Tea Company were the main character in the Tea Act
The Tea Act.
the tea act allowed the east india trading co (a british company) to have a tax break on selling tea but no tax break for the american merchants selling tea
" No Taxation without Representation." In 1773, Britain passed the Tea Act. This law gave British company the right to control all trade in tea. The colonist still have to pay tax. This angered colonial merchants and other colonists.
They caused the Boston Tea Party
It gave Britain a tea monopoly
Why were colonist angry after the tea act
tea act *no, its the Sugar Act*