"Why did the Emancipation Proclamation not actually free any enslaved people?"
a) European countries that suported the union
b) border states that were loyal to the union
c)territory already under control of the Union by January 1,1863
d)states still in rebellion agains the union after January 1,1863
Because Lincoln had no authority in the states that had broken away, and meanwhile he allowed slavery to continue in the Upper-South states that had remained loyal.
The Proclamation was a tactic to keep Britain and France from helping the Confederates, by turning the war into an official crusade against slavery, and introducing an ethical dimension to foreign involvement.
Few slaves were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation, because it applied only to areas still in rebellion -- where Federal proclamations meant nothing. However, it did encourage more slaves to escape to the safety of Union lines and over the next two years of war, tens of thousands did so. Also as Union troops moved into new areas, the Black slaves were made free. So, the proclamation did not free many slaves immediately, but it was a step toward freedom for many thousands.
Because it freed slaves in the southern states but during the civil war the confederacy actually disowned America and became its own. So the orders from Another Country meant nothing
No, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the enslaved persons. Only the slaves in the "rebellious states" were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation. The "rebellious states" were those which had seceded from the Union, except for the states that had already come under Northern control.
The Emancipation proclamation did not free the slaves in which state?
The very first emancipation proclamation said that all slaves in the Confederate States of America are free, which had no effect on slaves from Virginia because it was part of the Confederacy.
When Lincoln was president, the Emancipation Proclamation was to free all of the slaves in the Confederacy. :)
No. The Emancipation Proclamation, written by Abraham Lincoln, declared all slaves in the CONFEDERATE states free. This did no good because the confederate states were not in Lincoln's control at the time. This document said nothing about the UNION slaves, though. A couple of the states fighting on Lincoln's side still had slaves, and the emancipation proclamation did not set them free.
knew it did not specifically free all enslaved people
No, the Emancipation Proclamation did not free all the enslaved persons. Only the slaves in the "rebellious states" were freed by the Emancipation Proclamation. The "rebellious states" were those which had seceded from the Union, except for the states that had already come under Northern control.
The Emancipation Proclamation was very carefully worded to not free anyone anywhere at the time of its writing!The Emancipation Proclamation only freed the slaves inside states in rebellion (i.e. Confederacy) and not controlled by Union troops. These states obviously ignored the Emancipation Proclamation and did not free any slaves. At the time the Emancipation Proclamation was written Union troops did not control any of those states.The Emancipation Proclamation explicitly permitted states that had stayed in the Union to keep their slaves. This was because if the Emancipation Proclamation freed such slaves then these states would probably leave the Union and join the Confederacy. Lincoln could not afford to have that happen!In fact the Emancipation Proclamation was a Propaganda document to encourage European support for the Union, and it was not expected to have any effect on either slave masters or enslaved people.Actually freeing the enslaved people would have to wait until after the war.
The Emancipation proclamation did not free the slaves in which state?
The Emancipation Proclomation
The very first emancipation proclamation said that all slaves in the Confederate States of America are free, which had no effect on slaves from Virginia because it was part of the Confederacy.
No. The Emancipation Proclamation, written by Abraham Lincoln, declared all slaves in the CONFEDERATE states free. This did no good because the confederate states were not in Lincoln's control at the time. This document said nothing about the UNION slaves, though. A couple of the states fighting on Lincoln's side still had slaves, and the emancipation proclamation did not set them free.
When Lincoln was president, the Emancipation Proclamation was to free all of the slaves in the Confederacy. :)
The emancipation proclamation was intended to free all slaves in the South.
That would be the Emancipation Proclamation.
the emancipation proclamation also kept the nation together.
The Emancipation Proclamation was very carefully worded to not free anyone anywhere at the time of its writing!The Emancipation Proclamation only freed the slaves inside states in rebellion (i.e. Confederacy) and not controlled by Union troops. These states obviously ignored the Emancipation Proclamation and did not free any slaves. At the time the Emancipation Proclamation was written Union troops did not control any of those states.The Emancipation Proclamation explicitly permitted states that had stayed in the Union to keep their slaves. This was because if the Emancipation Proclamation freed such slaves then these states would probably leave the Union and join the Confederacy. Lincoln could not afford to have that happen!In fact the Emancipation Proclamation was a Propaganda document to encourage European support for the Union, and it was not expected to have any effect on either slave masters or enslaved people.Actually freeing the enslaved people would have to wait until after the war.