They feared an overpowering democracy could be tyrannical.
Framers opposed a direct democracy for many reasons. The most important reason is because they were afraid of the rule of a majority.
No limit
how did the framers use separation of powers and checks and balances to limit the powers of government
Government by the people. < ----correct novanet answer.
Pure democracy essentially means that majority opinion rules; the Framers feared that this would oppress the rights of minorities. So, they provided a framework for a republican form of government, consisting of elected representatives.
The Founders universally opposed democracy--we are a Republic, not a Democracy, which means, by definition, that we have a representative form of government not a direct vote. Alexander Hamilton said that "democracy was the surest path to tyranny".
tyranny of the majority
The founding fathers
The Framers knew the direct and pure form of democracy and they feared that the emotional decisions taken by the populace; which is called unrestricted Majority Rule; may violate the individual rights. Therefore they chose the republic form of government in which the people choose individuals to represent them and transform their will into rational and reasonable decisions. after many amendment in the US constitution the government became a democratic republic.. or what we can call "representative or liberal democracy".A republic as opposed to a pure democracy
the limit of democracy is being ruled by the free males were citizens.
NO. The United States is a representative democracy and its Constitution gives no provisions for direct democracy.
The political arrangement preferred by the Framers was that of a republic, rather than a pure democracy, for example. Thomas Jefferson was one of the framers of the US Constitution.