The farmers decided against abolishing slavery because they would have no one to work in the fields to harvest the crops and it was unheard of for them to do it themselves. In a nut shell they would lose money!
It wasn't considered an issue when it was written
slavery is abolished
In Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 used the phrase "The migration and importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit," to refer to the practice of slavery. So in one sense, it is argued that the Constitution has never mentioned the issue of slavery, per se, but everyone knew that that phrase meant "slavery" when the Constitution was adopted.
Why did the framers of the Constitution change their minds about some of the issues?
I think you have it wrong. The framers of the constitution wanted a federal government with limited powers. That was one of the reasons came here to get away from in England.
A slave that considered property of his/her owner. Chattel slavery is a form of slavery often associated with the prevalent style of early American slavery in which the slave is considered actual property. One can think of it being similar to owning livestock. You can buy a cow, do whatever you want with it, and its offspring also will belong to you.
well it is irrelivent to think that it wasenglish and colonial so... you realy cant know the answer to that.
Because farmers needed slaves to pick cotton, Dumb a$$, did you mean Framers?
I think you are confused. The confederacy wanted to keep slavery.
I think you mean Framers of the Constitution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States
I think you mean Framers of the Constitution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States
Why do you think the Progressive framers of the Arizona Constitution gave all of the control of water rights to the state? Explain your answer.
In Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 used the phrase "The migration and importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit," to refer to the practice of slavery. So in one sense, it is argued that the Constitution has never mentioned the issue of slavery, per se, but everyone knew that that phrase meant "slavery" when the Constitution was adopted.
i think its fredrick douglass
In Article I, Section 9, Clause 1 used the phrase "The migration and importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit," to refer to the practice of slavery. So in one sense, it is argued that the Constitution has never mentioned the issue of slavery, per se, but everyone knew that that phrase meant "slavery" when the Constitution was adopted.
Slave rebellions resulted in increased restrictions for slaves.
I think that mostly the Southerners were totally for slavery.
Why did the framers of the Constitution change their minds about some of the issues?
For the most part it wasn't seen as wrong. Most of the framers of the constitution had slaves. Washington and Jefferson included. The southern states were very powerful and worked against any antislavery movements.