Prior to the Civil War, all the states belonged to the same union. The point of the war was not to conquer the south, but merely to prevent it from leaving the union. The southern states, it should be noted, still have the same representation in Congress, the same voting power and the same rights that they always did, the only exception being that slavery was abolished by constitutional amendment. Many US Presidents have been elected from southern states, in the years following the Civil War. Lyndon Johnson was from Texas, as was George W. Bush and his father, George H.W. Bush; Bill Clinton was from Arkansas. So the south is not conquered territory, it is simply part of the United States.
The north wanted to conquer the south (and did).
no he didnt
US Civil War=North wanted to retain the South Vietnam War=North wanted to conquer the South
no he didnt
Look up the Anaconda Plan. it was the North's plan to cut off the South's economy. look it up broschi.
They both had a plan The north had the anaconda plan The south had the cotton diplomacy
no he didnt
Germany's plan was to conquer all of Europe (plus Russia). Japan's plan was to conquer all of South East Asia and most of the Pacific (and more, as military strength permitted).
The North.
North Vietnam wanted to conquer the south. They did.
Divide and conquer
The original proponent of the divide-and-conquer plan to win the Civil War was General Winfield Scott. A life-long soldier (and politician), Scott proposed a strategy to subjugate the South that was known as the Anaconda Plan, as it intended to strangle the South through a naval blockade and Union control of the Mississippi River, which would cut the South into two vulnerable (and weakened) halves.