go
see the "related link"
Because the opinions of the people will affect the public officials' careers and help then know how to help the people they serve.
Because the government couldn't collect taxes on illegally produced alcoholic beverages.
Because democrats are the majority for now in the US Government
Supreme Court justices and other Article III federal judges receive lifetime appointments, which is designed to insulate them from public and political pressure. Most public officials are either elected for set terms, or appointed at the pleasure of the President and Congress, and usually lose their position when the administration changes.
see the "related link"
For example, should the Government of Canada lose a budget vote (which would be an expression of non-confidence in the Government), the Government may propose a motion of confidence, which if passed would override the effect of the lost budget vote. (It would not revive the bill, but would prevent the defeat of the Government.) Motions of confidence always override motions of non-confidence.
President Nixon's solution concerning the lack of confidence in the government's secrecy system was to avoid disclosures that made the public lose confidence in the first place. He attempted to make secrecy an even more absolute presidential weapon. This solution was headed a dead end along with many other of his policies he had designed to revolutionize the presidency, which basically entailed giving the executive branch even more powers, if that was even possible.
Sled dogs do not lose confidence, infac it can help
Motions can absolutely override other motions. For example, should the Government of Canada lose a budget vote (which would be an expression of non-confidence in the Government), the Government may propose a motion of confidence, which if passed would override the effect of the lost budget vote. (It would not revive the bill, but would prevent the defeat of the Government.) Motions of confidence always override motions of non-confidence.
The draft.
The American public reacted with a growing fear to the Civil War in China. They probably felt sad and a little angry over the outcome and the lose of their soldier's lives.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 included provisions prohibiting discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in employment, education, and public accommodations. It also banned unequal application of voter registration requirements and segregation in public facilities.
I don't see a civil war happening over gun control. If there ever is a civil war, I am sure that it will happen before we lose all of our guns.
It depends on the economy. Ours is not based on gold or anything real, it is all perception. As a result how the public perceives the economy is key to it's health, key to it being accepted and supported. If people, the public lose confidence, see it as something based on perception, they will limit their exposure to it, limit their risk and that, like a run on a bank, can undermine they whole system.
It is not the concept of what did the civil rights did.. it is more of who was the civil rights act
The House of Commons can defeat a sitting government with a vote of no confidence. This is what led to the May 2011 Canadian Federal election.