Because the federal government would abolish slavery.
The federal government would not have survived because the people had thought that the federal government was trying to find more power for itself rather then for the people taking away their rights. After Washington had widespread respect he basically clarified that he was for the people and their rights.
True - the purpose of creating three independent branches of the federal government was to divide and limit the power within the government. Delegates feared that if one person or group had too much power, the U.S. would wind up back under the rule of a dictator or tyrant. The division of government created checks and balances to each decision made.
I would expect that all of the States wanted to protect the powers/rights that are designated for them by the restrictions on the Federal Government. The states in the south were very vocal that they felt the Federal government had greatly exceeded its powers and had passed unconstitutional laws. This was much of their basis for secession from the 'Union'.
The federal Government would only fiance state highways.
Since the Founding Period in American History, 'federalism' has changed profoundly. Originally conceived as a mere 'help-meet' to robustly independent state-governing bodies, the federal government has steadily grown in size and in its responsibilities. The present shape and power of federal government would be barely recognizable to many of the original Founders, especially as the term 'government' in American minds is today almost automatically associated with 'Washington, D.C.'. By contrast, in the Founding Period, that distinction was held by most of the individual state capitals around the nation.
The powers of the US Constitution were clearly "spelled out" for the most part. In order to satisfy statesmen that the Federal government would not have overwhelming power, the Constitution specifies that all powers not given to the Federal government belonged to the States. That is how power is divided between the States and the Federal government.
Then the states would have more power than the national government.
Another example of federal government taking states power would be the new ways of controlling the states spending, the government now gave out categorical grants from which it could control how the states spent this money. For some states the government was giving out over $200 billion dollars from which 90% of this would be categorical grants and the federal government would regulate how it was spent. The states therefore were restricted on what they could spend the money on and this further showed an increase in federal government's power.
it was agreed on that any new inventions and so on would be the responsibility of the federal government
A person who wants to greatly limit the federal government's power ACCORDING TO APEX
Federalism is a system of government where power is divided between the federal government and the states. The United States would be an example of this kind of government.
The governor of a state. the government of a state is in power that state
The federal government uses tax laws and funding to force the states to act in certain ways (drinking), if each state could ignore what the federal government says they would be eliminating its power.
It divided the federal government into the three branches
The framers wanted this because they didn't want the national government to get too strong and become a monarchy, like the one they just worked so hard to get out of. The constitution created a federal system as a compromise so that power of government would be shared between the states and federal government, and the federal government would not become too powerful. It was the only choice the founders thought they had in order to achieve this.
The federal government would not have survived because the people had thought that the federal government was trying to find more power for itself rather then for the people taking away their rights. After Washington had widespread respect he basically clarified that he was for the people and their rights.
why should a political system be unitary federal or confederal, because a federal system would allow the state would not be a single fraction, state government would be smaller and more reposnive to local needs.