because
Commerce power to include all commercial interactions
Some effects that the supreme court had on economic development were that the rulings reinforced capitalism as the ruling economic system in the U.S. Somewhere in the early 1800s, the Supreme Court made several rulings that helped define federal power over contracts and commerce. As aforementioned, these rulings reinforced capitalism as the ruling economic system in the United States.
The result of Gibbons v. Ogden was a landmark Supreme Court decision that established federal power over interstate commerce. The ruling clarified that the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution granted the federal government authority to regulate trade between states, leading to a broad interpretation of federal power in regulating economic activities.
In Gibbons v. Ogden, (1824), the US Supreme Court held that Congress has authority to regulate interstate commerce, or business between the states, under Article I, Section 8, the Commerce Clause. The Court interpreted "interstate commerce" broadly to include most state actions that impact other states' and the national economy.Case Citation:Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 (1824)
Both gave the federal government more power by expanding its authority in individual state's economic activities. McCulloch v Maryland gave the federal bank power over states, and Gibbons v Ogden gave Congress power to regulate interstate commerce.
The commerce clause
Commerce Power
interstate transportation
Gibbons v. Ogden was the landmark decision which Supreme Court held that the power to regulate interstate commerce was actually granted to the Congress by Commerce Clause in Article I of the Constitution.
The Commerce Clause of the Constitution (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) delegates to Congress the power.
The Commerce Power The Interstate Commerce Clause may be found in Article I, Section 8: "...To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes;"
There are several laws that have repeatedly come before the Supreme Court for interpretation. Some notable examples include the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech, religion, and assembly; the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures; the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which guarantees equal treatment under the law; and the Commerce Clause, which regulates interstate commerce. These laws often present complex and evolving issues that require the Supreme Court's interpretation and clarification.