1. Germany WASN'T moving convoys across the ocean.
2. Germany DIDN'T have a strong surface fleet, enough to challenge the allies.
3. The allies had to move across the water; the allies had the strongest surface fleets.
4. Subs was the only option the Germans had.
More InformationThe above points are essentially correct. It's interesting to note, however, that the Soviet Union (58), Great Britain (77), and France (62) all had more submarines in service at the beginning of the war than did Germany, with only 29 u-boats in service. But during the four years of conflict, Germany vastly out-built its enemies, producing 360 new u-boats. U-boat service was hazardous duty -- 179 were lost during the war.On the allied side: Britain, Canada, US and on the Axis Side: Germany and to a lesser extent Italy.
* Pacific: Japan -vs- United States, Australia, and to a smaller extent New Zealand and Great Britain * Western European: Germany & Italy -vs- Great Britain, United States, Free French, Canada, Belgium * Eastern European: Germany -vs- Russia
Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain.
Prime Minister David Lloyd George of Great Britain.
Britain (and to a lesser extent Ireland, officially neutral) represented a marshalling point for Allied armies and war material, close enough to bomb mainland Europe and Germany, and to project seapower around the continent. The delay and eventual cancellation of the invasion meant that American and Allied forces could attack the German military presence in Europe for the entire second half of the war.
The opponents of the Allies (the Triple Entente of Britain, France, and Russia) were the Central Powers: Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire (later Turkey) and to a lesser extent Bulgaria.Although Italy was originally allied with Germany (Triple Alliance), it did not attack the Allies but instead fought against Austria-Hungary along their common border.
To compete with the other empire building countries, specifically Germany, Spain and Great Britain, to a lessor extent Japan and France.
you tell me
It is true that Britain was unprepared for a war. It is true that no Allied nation was prepared for or wanted a war. It is true that knowing this Hitler "pushed" for every advantage he had. It is true that knowing France and Britain were obligated to protect Poland he went ahead and invaded. His attack was calculated on the premise that accomodation and Peace were not the real objectives of France and Britain, and that one more "bite" from the "pie" might, just might, be tolerated. It was an error in judgement. The Sudetenland was not important. Active defiance of the European powers was important and could not, and should not have been ignored. When Germany attacked Poland, the dice had been thrown and the Second Great World War had begun.
The issue of death camps was not prominent during the war, and the extent to which the murder of civilians by Germany occured was greatly underestimated by the Allies. In any case, 'rescue' was absolutely impossible without first defeating Germany, an undertaking which required the combined strength of the Soviet Union, the United States, Great Britain, and various other Allied nations, over several years. The term 'Holocaust' itself did not come into general use until many years after the war, and Nazi policies of genocide, especially directed against Jews and Romany (gypsy) were side issues, never comparable in importance to the victory of the Allied forces and the defeat of Germany.
Japanese and most German prisoners remained confined to Allied camps. Many Italian prisoners were allowed out to work on farms in Britain and Australia and in many cases left the camps for the duration of the war. As for Allied prisoners in Axis hands, the Japanese and to a lesser extent the Germans required prisoners to work, in the case of the Japanese, often to death.
You would have to ask the Germans. They rely on natural gas from Russia to a large extent, and are putting in a lot of renewables, so perhaps they think they don't need nuclear. In Britain views are different, at least among government advisors.