After checking out the devastation and the sickness no other nation wanted to get in an atomic Holocaust.
yes, both..................
the decision to drop the bombs caused the Japanese surrender. This prevented massive casualties on both sides in the Operation Downfall invasion of Japan and from an otherwise prolonged war.
You are confused, a nuclear bomb is a general name covering both "atomic bomb" and "hydrogen bomb". A hydrogen bomb is typically higher yield than an atomic bomb, although it is possible to design very small low yield hydrogen bombs for special purposes that have lower yield than "typical" atomic bombs. However for "typical" hydrogen bombs their yield is roughly 1000 times the yield of a "typical" atomic bomb.
They are completely unrelated other than the coincidence of their both happening in World War II.The Holocaust was the natural result of Nazi racial policies.The Atomic Bomb is a very powerful explosive device.
The first atom bomb was the test explosion at the White Sands test range in New Mexico. The first use in anger was at Hiroshima in Japan.
It was both: an atomic bomb using uranium as its fuel.
Yes, it ended WW2 with the least loss of life (on both sides).
Yes, both.
atomic bomb or the hydrogen bomb
Nagasaki and Hiroshima, both in Japan
A uranium bomb is an atomic bomb fueled by uranium-235A plutonium bomb is an atomic bomb fueled by plutonium-239A composite bomb is an atomic bomb fueled by both uranium-235 and plutonium-239A wet bomb is a hydrogen bomb fueled by liquefied deuterium/tritiumA dry bomb is a hydrogen bomb fueled by solid lithium deuteride
America dropped an atomic bomb on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
they were both treated to an atomic bomb
atomic bomb caused harm while the nuclear energy can be both harmful(radiation) and harmless(for electricity).
No helicopter dropped any atomic bomb. The two A-bombs used in combat were both dropped by a B-29 bomber.
yes, both..................
They are both the same thing.