Because the Al-Qaeda won
because they didnt want slaves they didnt need them. Dont use this for your homework or research papaer like i did because all these answers are wrong. soo i hope you use this answer:)
The south was agriculturally heavy, so they needed someone to do the hard work. The north was focused much more on industrial type jobs, which did not need slaves.
People in the North didn't need slaves because they didn't have as many large farms as the South did. So the answer would be all the states in the northern part. If you want more information than go tohttp://library.thinkquest.org/J0112391/slavery.htm
To answer a question we need a who, what, when, where, why or how. Your question needs a what.
No. By the mid 1700's slavery had been outlawed in several northeastern states. Yet, the Black citizens did not escape discrimination in those states. The southern states because of the need for slaves due to crop production held the largest population of slaves. Yes, they were.
because they didnt want slaves they didnt need them. Dont use this for your homework or research papaer like i did because all these answers are wrong. soo i hope you use this answer:)
The upper southern states were the first to start freeing slaves. The northern states were already free states and didn't need to free any slaves.
Because they were agricultural, and they needed the slaves to make money. So to them, no money equals no slaves. As for the northern states, they didn't need and didn't like slaves.
The Southern states wanted slaves because they had big plantations so they need lots of workers. And the Northern states wanted the opposite of that.
The south was agriculturally heavy, so they needed someone to do the hard work. The north was focused much more on industrial type jobs, which did not need slaves.
When writing the constitution the southern states had the slave population while the northern states didn't and the compromise was added so when counting the population for House representation that the slaves wouldn't be counted as a whole person. The smaller northern states were afraid that the larger south would have too much power in Congress.
Northern States Moved toward Emancipation of their slave and most southern states resticted the importation of salves.. -Sirchain *I am not sure what the correct answer is, but i felt the need to inform anyone reading this answer that it is wrong; Southern states made no moves to restrict the importation of slaves and the Northern States did not see slavery as a major issue at this point in history. -Sephcmc
People in the North didn't need slaves because they didn't have as many large farms as the South did. So the answer would be all the states in the northern part. If you want more information than go tohttp://library.thinkquest.org/J0112391/slavery.htm
Technically, no. The District of Columbia had slavery until April 16, 1862, but it is a federal district, not a state.
Some white individuals who did not own slaves supported protecting the institution of slavery due to economic reasons, such as fear of losing their livelihood if slavery was abolished. Others may have held racist beliefs that justified the subjugation of African Americans. Additionally, social and cultural norms at the time often promoted the belief in white superiority and the preservation of the existing social order.
No. Not all Ancient greek city states allow slaves b/c the laws are different and some rich people don't need slaves or don't have the money to afford one
because they thought it was wrong and cruel. Also they didnt need them to work out on the farm since the north had many factories