The Anti-Federalists did not like the U.S. Constitution in its original form because they thought it gave too much power to the Federal Government. They wanted the states to have more power.
The federalists promised to attach a bill of rights because the anti-federalists were writing series of papers like the federalists and by attaching the bill of rights the anti-federalists no longer had an argument. Which means the federalists won and were able to keep the constitution. They were the first ten amendments to the constitution.
The Anti-Federalists did not like the new strength the central government would possess. Additionally, the constitution did not have a Bill of Rights when the states were in the ratifying process.
because they felt like not being conceded
The anti-Federalists didn't like the power the Constitution gave the federal government. They believed this would lead to the same type of tyrannical government that they had fought to get rid of. They were also not happy that the initial draft did not contain a Bill of Rights.
The main idea was to convince anti-federalists (like the New York LEgislature) to ratify the constitution
Well, it's because the Anti- Federalists wanted freedom and didn't want the Constitution like the Federalists did. The Federalists wanted the Anti- Federalists work together and create a new and better system of government.
At the time of the writing of the US Constitution, political parties as we know them today were not involved. There were two opposing groups during that time, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. The Federalists wanted more government control over the states, and the Anti-Federalists were something like today's Libertarians (wanting more independence for the states). These two groups had to compromise to get our constitution ratified. The Bill of Rights, the first 10 amendments to the constitution, was included because it guaranteed that the federal government could not have too much control over individuals: This was done to satisfy the Anti-Federalists.
The anti federalists said the constitution was an illegal document because they said that the delegates had only been authorized to repair the articles of confederation, not make a new document, so it was not a legal document.
The Anti-Federalists did not like the U.S. Constitution in its original form because they thought it gave too much power to the Federal Government. They wanted the states to have more power.
The two sides in the debate over the ratification of the Constitution were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Federalists, including figures like Alexander Hamilton and James Madison, supported the Constitution, arguing that a stronger central government was necessary for national stability and effective governance. In contrast, Anti-Federalists, such as Patrick Henry and George Mason, opposed the Constitution, fearing that it would create a powerful central government that could threaten individual liberties and the rights of states. This debate ultimately led to the inclusion of the Bill of Rights to address some of the concerns raised by the Anti-Federalists.
they didnt like it and grew very angry. But there was nothing they could do to stop the articles from being law.
Anti-Federalists were those who opposed ratification of the Constitution of the United States created by the delegates at the Constitutional Convention. The Anti-Federalists feared centralized power, one of the arguments used in declaring independence from Great Britain. They also believed that republican institutions, like the government created by the Constitution, could only survive in small countries. Many Anti-Federalists agreed to drop their opposition to the new government under the Constitution, only when it was agreed that a Bill of Rights would be added by the first Congress.