To effectively answer this question it behoves that we first note the differences between African Leaders (especially Sub Saharan) and the 'Others'.
In Africa tribal chieftaincy gains its teeth from the populace, who view every aspect of life from tribal considerations. Since no African leader anticipates a win in any election without the majority of votes coming their way from their tribes, this makes them tribal chieftains, and actually the pseudo-nationalists they claim not to be.
The tribesman's push, which draws its venom from the common desire to 'dominate' the other tribes, informs heavily the leaders' priority to do everything to satisfy this 'tribal blackmail'. In my view, this is the genesis of greed, corruption and despotism.
Military coups, murders, the sheer lack of institutions of control and moderation (like anti corruption watchdogs, even diplomacy, simply become a means that must justify the end.
Once the above ills of governance are in place, it becomes necessary to cover ones tracks to cover the leaders' backs, and offer 'protection' to their cronies, the 'brothers(& sisters)-in-crime'. When African Leaders find themselves in such obvious consequences, the last thing in their minds is to quit leadership.
Quiting leadership, with another opposing dictator in power, means scrutiny, investigation, sabotage and a malicious call to take over all personal and national gains, legally or illegally acquired.
Therein therefore, lies the reasons for clinging to power even when it's time to leave.
African leaders may want to remain in power due to factors such as a desire for personal power and influence, fear of losing privileges and wealth, belief in their ability to bring about positive change, or concerns about instability and lack of succession planning. These motivations can contribute to leaders seeking to extend their terms in office through various means.
An abolitionist is someone that wants to end slavery. In the United States, abolitionists worked to end the African and Native American slave trade and give those slaves their full freedom.
Needs and wants affect ecology by influencing resource consumption and waste production. Meeting our needs sustainably can promote healthy ecosystems, while excessive wants can lead to overconsumption, habitat destruction, and pollution. Balancing our needs and wants can help preserve biodiversity and maintain ecological balance.
yes i wants to join
Economics is the term that refers to the study of how individuals fulfill their needs and wants by generating income through their own labor and efforts.
People satisfy their wants and needs by making choices on how to allocate their limited resources such as time, money, and energy. This involves prioritizing between different needs and wants, budgeting resources efficiently, and making trade-offs to maximize satisfaction. By managing their resources wisely, individuals can work towards fulfilling their needs and achieving their desired outcomes.
No government form has unlimited power in the world (eventually other countries will intervene), but in a dictatorship, the dictator can do virtually whatever he wants.
Bashar Al-Assad is killing people because he wants to remain in power and the people will make him not president anymore.
any one who wants to
Well all these anwsers are correct but what did he leaders represent and everyone wants more.
yup
Because Juliet is there, and where she is, he wants to be.
Get a mudkipz
To you directly. Be wary of people who claim to be God's messenger to you. Ask yourself if that claim (when you accept it) gives them any power over you.
I think the people of India are fed up of politics (as the leaders r not gr8) and wants new efficient and capable leaders.
Becauce they wants to speared their power into the spreed wants to show their tank power to the world
No, it is not true that when wants are supported by purchasing power it becomes needs. Needs are items that have to be purchased, wants are items that are desired.
Remain friends and move on. Plain and simple!