answersLogoWhite

0


Want this question answered?

Be notified when an answer is posted

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do Some farmers currently grow genetically engineered crops an argument against the use of this technology is that?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Biology

In evaluating an argument an important first step is to?

determine exactly what the conclusion is


How will humans evolve if they lived on Mars?

One argument: Evolution is caused by a need to adapt to the world around it. It is fair to say that in a society so advanced that its technology allows human beings to live on Mars, 99-100 percent of people will be able to reach the stage of reproduction and bring up a child. In such a society, the concept of 'survival of the fittest' will be rendered obsolete and therefore so will evolution.


Is cloning humans ethical?

no Yes It depends on your definition of ethical. Is it unethical to clone cattle for food? Is it unethical to clone mice for pharmaceutical study? Opponents say "it's playing God", but they said that about almost every medical advancement from birth control pills to heart transplants, and even to genetically-modified foods. (Humans have been genetically modifying food and animals forever through selective breeding. In-vitro and DNA manipulation simply speeds up the process). Why would or should cloning humans be any different? Identical twins are a result of cloning in the womb. Take religion out of the picture and you would have a hard time making the unethical argument. What would be unethical would be cloning for spare parts. If the cloned person was treated no differently than a twin, a complete human person, then where is the problem?


Do Darwin's argument was scientific?

Yes. Even though Darwin called the Origin " one long " argument " the book was well supported by the evidence of the day and gave ways to falsify the material in the book,. hypothesis for testing and predictions on what would be found that turned out to be quite accurate. So, scientific.


Why do some believe creationists are so dumb?

Because every argument they make in support of creationism / denial of evolution is demonstrably false.

Related questions

What is an argument for halting the advances of technology?

Using cell phones while driving


Will he ever call after an argument?

It depends on how you relate to him during times of a non argument. If he usually iniates contact then after an argument will be no different. Keep in mind it could be hours, days, weeks, etc but if has ever or currently does care he will contact you.


Which argument supports the perception of big business leaders as captains of industry?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Which argument supports the perception of big business leader as captains of industry?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Which argument supports the perception of big business leader as 'captains of industry'?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Which argument supports the perception of big businesses leaders as captains of industry?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Which argument supports the perception of big business leaders as “captains of industry”?

Industrialists' support for technology benefited the economy.


Nicholas carr argument about it is no longer gives a companies a competitive advantage?

Carr's main argument is that as the ubiquity of information technology grows, and costs lessen, the overall advantage decreases. He originally published his argument in the Harvard Business Review, and it caused a backlash from those who disagreed.


What breeds of dogs have been genetically altered to Benefit humans?

I think the argument can be made that EVERY modern dog breed has been created/"genetically altered"/specifically bred soley to benefit humans. Every dog breed has evolved to suit someone's role in life, such as: guarding, herding, hunting, companion, etc.


Would this be a good argument in a persuasive speech While mondern technology has made cell phones very useful in todays society they have become incredibly dangerous when used while driving?

Yes. I agree that it is a valid argument. But then it is the usage rather than the terchnology. This way one can argue about any technology. Automobiles kill tens of thousands of people every year all over the world. One has to control the usage of technology in a proper environment and responsibly.


What does counter argument mean?

A counter argument is an argument made against another argument.


The burden of technology?

It could be said that the burden of technology is that once something has been invented or discovered it cannot be "uninvented" or "undiscovered" again. This argument has been used in the description of atomic and nuclear weapons. As much as we might like to uninvent them, we simply cannot. Technology cannot be re-gressed, it must always PROgress, and that is what makes it a burden.