answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

First, you need to learn what the word theory means to a scientist.

Simplified, it's a way of thought that's been tested,

What you mean is a hypothesis---or just some guy's weird idea.. with no proof.

Second, most atheists have read the bible, many have read The Bhagavad Gita, the Quran, the Tibetan Book of the Dead, and assorted other religious texts. They have decided that all of them are just Fairy Tales.

Unfortunately, there is no more (scientific, that is, reproducible) evidence that God doesn't exist than there is that He does.

AnswerThe first poster did well. In summary, who pointed out (in science) a "theory" carries far more weight than a mere fact. A fact is just something that happens. A theory is something which can reliably predict facts time after time after time. It takes a lot to become a theory, and it is the highest level you can get in science. The word means something very different from Columbo stumbling into a room and muttering "I have a theory.."

Nobody would ever claim that a theory is *always* right. Technically, a theory has always been right so far. if it is ever wrong, then it gets changed or even abandoned altogether. A famous example if the Theory of Gravity, by Sir Isaac newton. It's wrong. We know it is wrong. Einstein's theory said it would be wrong, and the facts (which turned up later) showed that Einstein was more reliable than Newton. So anyone who tells you that theories are always correct is simply wrong. They aren't: even the big, famous ones. Newton is still used, though, because his equations are easier to work out. And putting a satellite within a few metres is good enough for NASA, as long as they aim for a big, flat area.

What you are probably asking is why scientists say that theories are more reliable than the Bible. The answer is fairly simple: Theories have been tried again and again and always turned up correct (or have been modified or abandonded). The Bible gives you rules to sell your daughter into sexual slavery (Leviticus); allows you to kill people for having the wrong hairstyle (Leviticus again); condones genocide, rape, and child murder (Exodus and lots of other places).

Limiting ourselves to the New Testament, the bible contradicts itself all over the place. Answer me this: did Mary see an angel remove the stone from the tomb of Jesus? Read all four gospels. You cannot give me a yes or no answer. In fact, you cannot even combine those accounts into one story which includes everything the gospels mention and doesn't contradict itself.

Which would you prefer scientists followed? Ideas which have been repeatedly shown to be correct-or a book which contradicts itself and condones genocide?

As Penn and Teller said: read the Bible. Seriously. Sit down and read it. We need more atheists. And there's nothing so likely to create an atheist than reading the Bible. Cover to cover. Please. Go do it.

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do atheists say a theory is always right how can it be science if they did not even read the bible?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

What is atheists Bible text?

there is no bible :P


Does athesist have a Bible?

If you mean Atheists, no they do not have a bible.


Why would the religion of atheism use the bible to bash bible thumpers it's like Christians using science against scientists so atheists are guilty just haters?

A:This is less a question than a polemic against atheism. It suggests that it is somehow wrong for atheists to answer biblical preaching by quoting from the believer's own Bible. But Christians do use science in an attempt to disprove scientific theories that contradict the Bible; it is just that such attempts are so unsuccessful that they are generally not noticed. Most atheists have no objection to other people believing the Bible and going to church. It is only when they find themselves challenged for not sharing the Christian belief that they sometimes use the Bible to justify their unbelief.


What was Galileo's objection to using the bible to study physical natural phenomena?

The Bible isn't science and may or may not be true. Galileo needed to have to experiment with real science and find out if his theory was correct.


Do atheist have some kind of a bible?

No. Atheists do not have any kind of book that functions like the bible. They have no center authority, like the Pope does in Catholicisms. The only "guideline" atheists have is to not believe in a higher existence, or afterlife.


What verses in the Bible advocate killing atheists?

Atheists specifically are not mentioned in the Bible, but there are numerous verses condemning blasphemy, a crime of which an atheist would certainly be responsible, with death. See the Related Link with such quotes.


Which religion uses the shortest bible other than atheist?

Just to be clear, and maybe answer the question; Atheists have no bible and is not a religion


What is 10 things that's science and not science?

all about technology is Science but the things the Bible mentions are not Science. Science is different to a Bible. Science is made by a person but the Bible is only wrote by a man but God made it.


Why are creationists upset with Darwin's theory?

His theory doesn't fit with their ideas. They usually use the Bible to answer questions that science already has or is working on. These are questions that are not scientific questions but ones that are best debated and answered by philosophy.


How do you tell the Bible is true?

The Bible wasn’t written to teach science or to be a school textbook, but what it says about scientific matters is always accurate. When the Bible talks about history, it is always accurate.The fact that so many Bible prophecies have already come true means that we can trust what the Bible says about the future. The Bible can change your life. It can help you to know who you really are. It can help you to understand your deepest thoughts and feelings. Truly the Word of God.


Who is the author of the Bible quran and science?

The Bible is God; the Koran is Muhammed; and Science is mankind.


How to respond to someone who says that The bible is not scientifically accurate?

"you just got to believe!" You could always say that God and Jesus aren't science. Since God and Jesus have supernatural powers, and since science doesn't support supernatural powers or religion and faith, people would always say The Bible isn't scientifically accurate - The Bible is just a recording what Jesus taught us, but The Bible is accurate with faith and religion. The Bible isn't scientifically accurate only because science is the practice of fact and leaves out all traces of faith and religion, so this whole statement is a response to someone who says that The Bible isn't scientifically accurate.