He isn't, except in fiction & mythology, principally because he never existed, at least as King of Britain (and still less of England, which came centuries after his supposed time). He inspired a very good Monty Python film though.
arthur may have been a signifigant part of british history . his reign was said to be amazing . archelogist have found other evidence and since little is know about this midevil king alot of history could have been lost with evidence of him . if they study more on King Arthur then alot of holes in british history can be solved .
what your asking is kid of like why do people study Alexander the great or why do people study president Lincoln ? why? because they were important people .
The legend of King Arthur has magic, knights, castles and adventure with people who do extrordinary things. -What more could anyone want!
the treatment of king Arthur is suitable for a legendary king because he was a well known man to many people
Most people believe it was King Uther, Arthur'sfather.There are many fans of these stories that study on Wikipedia pages for hours if they're really interested. And some who have creative urges start writing books about it, whether they publish it or not.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
Such statistics are not recorded
There's like 4 different people that King Arthur may have been inspired by. Arthnou is only one of them, and the only evidence that points to him is the inscription on the stone or whatever the hell they found. Truthfully, King Arthur was a fictious figure and wasn't particularly inspired by any king or knight in particular. Side note: the other people that are said to have been the basis for King Arthur are Lucius Artorius Castus and Riothamus.
king arthur live about 22464years ago hello people.
the treatment of king Arthur is suitable for a legendary king because he was a well known man to many people
The legend of King Arthur has magic, knights, castles and adventure with people who do extrordinary things. -What more could anyone want!
Well, it's a fact that King Arthur was an actual person, however, his power might have been exaggerated. But yes, the King of England did meet King Arthur.
Clothes.
Most people believe it was King Uther, Arthur'sfather.There are many fans of these stories that study on Wikipedia pages for hours if they're really interested. And some who have creative urges start writing books about it, whether they publish it or not.
King Arthur is a legendary king and did not exist.
The people of Camelot. Later Albion, which is all of Britain
Such statistics are not recorded
The people of Cameliard were joyous when King Arthur and his men returned from battle, welcoming them with celebration and happiness.
King Arthur was king of Britain
king arthur was nice and overprotective