The main problem about fake conspiracies is that some people like to hoax and trick others (in the media, newspapers, Net, all sorts), and that's a fact.
I used to work in the printing/publishing trade. I worked innocently for some time, and then the boss started to tell myself and teach myself "touching up films" that meant, basically, camera tricks that make something look for real when it's printed (e.g. as a photo or a film or a printout), when its' not for real at all.
The Moon hoax is fairly easy to see through IF you know about photolithography, filmwork and camera tricks in the printing trade. Its' a matter of several layers of film. Its' a type of photographic editing, but its' deceptive. The films that "prove" and the films that "disprove" the Moon landing is actually difficult for most people to see the truth of only because what they are looking at it sometimes a deceptive media-boss lie, it's difficult because the PROOF is edited OUT, to so-called prove something happened when it didn't, or to so-called prove it didn't happen when it DID.
About the Moon landing: it DID HAPPEN. Truly, it did. The photos that seem to give photographic proof is a printing trade hush-hush secret. I've seen later on, after being bashed into a wheelchair by the so-called boss and staff since I told them I was going to go to the Police about things like that, later on I saw both photos that seem to prove the moon-landing happened, and photos that seems to prove it didn't. I've looked at both and done some review of how both photos etc., were done, and came up with evidence based on experience of how some photos lie and some tell the truth: the result of it is: MANKIND TRULY DID GO TO THE MOON, the Eagle landed, and those things happened, for real.
There is way more evidence, scientific evidence at that, proving the trade towers AND building 7 came down in precise demolition form. They needed a premise for war, and to get the public and congress behind it the men behind the curtain needed a huge death toll, heck I even wanted to sign up for service after seeing it on tv the first time. However, what you see is'nt always what you get and after looking into the evidence later on I was compelled to believe differently about it. I think it stops being a conspiracy when there is sufficient enough evidence and proof to make conspiracy, truth.
Because of Ptolemy. This was a case of both secular and religious authorities forcing a theory (which was proven wrong in the ancient world) to be the received wisdom, due to a reluctance to accept new theories. It is taught to scientists nowadays as a warning, to always be on the watch that they do not grow so comfortable with a theory that they will struggle to defend it, even against overwhelming evidence to the contrary..
Most people recognize that Neil Armstrong and several other American Astronauts did go to the moon. Contrary assertions by conspiracy buffs cannot be supported by the evidence. See related links for more information.
Yes. Contrary to what many believe, hills do not stop tornadoes.
On the contrary! A star has planets, which circulate it. And planets have moons. Stars do not circle planets.
On the contrary, my friend, they get quite large. Your eyes also tend to get bloodshot.
A child does not have the capacity to question things like an adult and put their complete trust in their parents/carers. Childlike faith is therefore innocent and unquestioning.
Polytheism, i.e. multiple gods, and not believing in Christ. Other than that, depends on the church.
The scientific fact of the matter is that they don't, in spite of the rumors and folklore to the contrary.
Contrary to the general belief the overwhelming majority of snowflakes do not have a particular shape. Just a few have crystalline fractal shapes, similar to tree branches, for example.
Contrary to the general belief the overwhelming majority of snowflakes do not have a particular shape. Just a few have crystalline fractal shapes, similar to tree branches, for example.
No, definite scientific evidence has never been published nor has any definite evidence to the contrary been produced.
There is no way from the texts of the plays or the sonnets to obtain personal information about Shakespeare, conspiracy theories to the contrary. It is a 20th Century conceit, based on modern Psychology, to expect authors to inject personal information into their art.
There is no way from the texts of the plays or the sonnets to obtain personal information about Shakespeare, conspiracy theories to the contrary. It is a 20th Century conceit, based on modern Psychology, to expect authors to inject personal information into their art.
There is no way from the texts of the plays or the sonnets to obtain personal information about Shakespeare, conspiracy theories to the contrary. It is a 20th Century conceit, based on modern psychology, to expect authors to inject personal information into their art.
Contrary to what you may have read on conspiracy websites, the fact remains: Barack Obama was born in a hospital in Honolulu, Hawaii in August 1961. There is very thorough documentation of this.
No.There is a lot of misunderstanding about laws against Holocaust denial. In countries that have such laws (for example, Germany) there is no requirement for "believing in the Holocaust". The prohibition or ban is on publicly denying it. The laws do not say "Thou shalt believe in the Holocaust".Nevertheless, this is a restriction on freedom of speech ...Incidentally, contrary to a widespread misconception, Britain has no law against Holocaust denial.
Like all scientific models and theories, there are two things which lead to it becoming accepted: predictions being accurate, and the absence of contrary evidence.