0
Why do presidential candidates spend more time in states with large population?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Presidential candidates spend more time in states with larger populations because these states have more delegates. If they win these states, they will make it harder for the other candidate to win the election.
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
Wiki User
∙ 9y agoThey spend more time in these states because they get more electoral votes. Electoral votes is what counts for the final counts.
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Where do the presidential candidates concentrate their campaigns -?
Candidates concentrate on what are known as swing states. These are states that polls indicate are close to even as to which candidate they will vote for, The concentration is most intense in swing states with a large number of electoral votes.
Why would a presidential candidate spend more time campaigning in states like California Texas or New York?
Presidential candidates may spend more time campaigning in states like California, Texas, or New York because they have large populations and a significant number of electoral votes. Winning these states can heavily impact the outcome of the election. Additionally, these states have diverse demographics and may offer a broad platform for candidates to communicate their message to a wide audience.
Why must candidates pay attention to smaller states when campaigning?
The electoral college is based on the house of representatives and the senate. The house of representatives is based on the population and usually the larger states have a bigger population. That is why the press pays more attention to large states during the general election.
What is the population of United States Virgin Islands' At-large congressional district?
United States Virgin Islands' At-large congressional district's population is 108,612.
What happened to the population as a result of dust bowl migrants?
Rural states lost population, while states with large cities gained population.
What issue were large and small states arguing about at the constitution convention small answer please?
Political power. Large population states threatened to overwhelm the voices of the small population states. In addition, if you expand the definition of "large vs small," the economically larger states threaten the economically less wealthy states.
Why did the small states object the delegates being assigned according to population?
Small states didn't have the population numbers compared to the large so in any vote or situation they would always be out numbered by the large states.
Which states cast their electoral votes for both candidtes?
Most states appoint their electors on a winner-take-all basis, based on the statewide popular vote on Election Day. Maine and Nebraska are the only two current exceptions. Maine and Nebraska distribute their electoral votes proportionally, with two at-large electors representing the statewide winning presidential and vice-presidential candidates and one elector each representing the winners from each of their Congressional districts.
What Constitutional Convention the Virginia Plan would have granted more power to?
granted power to the states with a large population and Carmelo Anthony is the best nba player joe flacco is the best nfl player
Which historically relied most on a large population for manufacturing industries?
Rustbelt states
What is the electoral college's impact on campaign strategies?
Large states have more electors than the small states and so are the key to winning the election. Furthermore, there is the winner-take-all rule in 48 states, under which all of a state's electoral votes are awarded to the one candidate who carries the state. Consequently, states with only three votes and states that are considered either safe or hopelessly lost are largely ignored in the campaign. Presidential candidates heavily concentrate their attention on a handful of closely divided "battleground" states. For example in 2008 over half (57%) of the events were in just four states (Ohio, Florida, Pennsylvania and Virginia). In 2004, candidates spent over 99% of their money in just 16 states.
Are all states of equal importance under the electoral college system?
No. Not only do electoral votes have an enormous disparity in the number of voters represented, but the awarding of all of a state's votes to one candidate means that votes for other candidates become effectively moot. The "winner take all" system makes the states with more electoral votes more important in the election. The presidential candidate with the most votes wins all the electoral votes of the state (in 48 states). The result is that winning a few large population states, even by a tiny margin, can guarantee election to the presidency. A candidate who received 51% of the vote in just 11 large "swing" states could win the Presidency with as little as 25% of the popular vote. (This is, however, unlikely.)
