Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that people can recreate it and see the results for themselves.
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Hopefully the publish their negative results.
Scientists publish papers in scientific journals or they email other scientists.
By telling Kobe to Publish it to the media. (KC) Emerson
Biology in General and Ecology are both scientific journals that allow scientist to publish articles. An added benefit is the fact that some journals also peer review the articles.
It is very important for scientists to publish important details because other scientists can reach to a conclusion of their experiment and they can give their opinion of how to improve it and also how to notify other people about the experiment so others are aware of it.
Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that: 1. Others can try to reproduce the results. 2. Their work can be repeated. 3. Their experimental procedures can be reviewed.
Because a research study is necessary to be repeated, checked, confirmed.
Part of a scientist's job is to publish his ideas, experiments, and theories for other scientists to test and confirm
Sometimes the scientists can't think of a suitable theory to explain their results but publish their experiments anyway to provide data for others so maybe another scientist can create a theory.
batty
Its important because other scientist can know what they're working on and if its accurate, or if they can improve their findings.
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.
Peer review
Hopefully the publish their negative results.
Do you mean "what are"? If so, I would think hypothesis and conclusion...