answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

Sometimes the scientists can't think of a suitable theory to explain their results but publish their experiments anyway to provide data for others so maybe another scientist can create a theory.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Why do scientists publish the results of experiments before creating a Theory?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Why do scientist publish the details if important experiments?

Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that people can recreate it and see the results for themselves.


What do scientists do when experiments show their hypotheses to be incorrect?

Hopefully the publish their negative results.


Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that?

Scientists publish the details of important experiments so that: 1. Others can try to reproduce the results. 2. Their work can be repeated. 3. Their experimental procedures can be reviewed.


When scientists are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedure they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


Why do scientists publish the results for their work?

To Verify Their Work


What do scientists do after the reach conclusions from the results of their experiments?

They share the results of the experiment.


When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they use?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientists are ready to publish the result of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures they used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


When scientist are ready to publish the results of their experimentation why is it important for them to include a description of the procedures the used?

Good science is reproducible, meaning that other scientists should be able to conduct the same analysis and get similar results. If scientists try the experiments and get different results, then it often means that the original publishers did something wrong.


After fisnishing an experiment scientists their results?

Publish. (Or try to, at least.)


How do scietists today communicate results and conclusions?

They do experiments and publish their findings in scientific journals.