0
The Roman used the numeral IIII to represent 4 but later this notation was replaced by IV, which fits in better with the general rules of writing Roman numerals and is also shorter. Earlier clocks in particular tend to use the older style of writing 4 as IIII.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is wrong with a clocks roman numerals?
On some clocks they use IIII instead of IV and VIIII instead of IX. They are not really wrong, just not the common way. See the link below for an excellent answer to the question.
What is the roman numeral 4 for clocks?
IIII isn't the technical one but it's what most clocks use. the real one is IV
Why do some clock faces use IIII instead of IV for four in roman numerals?
The use of "IIII" instead of "IV" on clock faces is mainly due to historical design conventions. It is thought that using "IIII" instead of "IV" creates better visual balance on the clock face, as the four and eight symbols (IV and VIII) are visually symmetric. Additionally, using "IIII" instead of "IV" may have been a way to avoid confusion with the Roman numeral for six (VI), as the two numerals might have looked similar in certain fonts or styles.
What is IIII Roman Numerals?
That is not a roman numeral.I = 1II = 2III = 3IV = 4V = 5VI = 6VII = 7VIII = 8IX = 9X= 10Another response:Actually, it was a Roman numeral. The Romans were superstitious, and since "IV" were the first two letters of Jupiter's name, they used IIII for four. That's why old fashioned clocks show IIII instead of IV.Another response:But now IV is used.Another response:I'm sorry, but I'd disagree. IV may well be used, but if one is using Roman numerals, one should use them as the Roman's did. Fancy clocks made today still do it the Roman way, with the IIII. If one wishes to be modern, or logically consistent, then one still doesn't use "IV", but rather "4".
Is the roman numeral llll still used on modern clocks?
No, the Roman numeral for 4 is IV, not llll. The use of llll is a common mistake, but traditional Roman numeral representations on clocks and other time-related devices use IV instead of llll for the numeral 4.
What is wrong with a clocks roman numerals?
On some clocks they use IIII instead of IV and VIIII instead of IX. They are not really wrong, just not the common way. See the link below for an excellent answer to the question.
What is the roman numeral 4 for clocks?
IIII isn't the technical one but it's what most clocks use. the real one is IV
How do you make 4's in roman numerals?
The most usual way (these days) is IV. However the romans often used IIII and you will still see IIII on clocks that use roman numerals.
Why do some clock faces use IIII instead of IV for four in roman numerals?
The use of "IIII" instead of "IV" on clock faces is mainly due to historical design conventions. It is thought that using "IIII" instead of "IV" creates better visual balance on the clock face, as the four and eight symbols (IV and VIII) are visually symmetric. Additionally, using "IIII" instead of "IV" may have been a way to avoid confusion with the Roman numeral for six (VI), as the two numerals might have looked similar in certain fonts or styles.
What is IIII Roman Numerals?
That is not a roman numeral.I = 1II = 2III = 3IV = 4V = 5VI = 6VII = 7VIII = 8IX = 9X= 10Another response:Actually, it was a Roman numeral. The Romans were superstitious, and since "IV" were the first two letters of Jupiter's name, they used IIII for four. That's why old fashioned clocks show IIII instead of IV.Another response:But now IV is used.Another response:I'm sorry, but I'd disagree. IV may well be used, but if one is using Roman numerals, one should use them as the Roman's did. Fancy clocks made today still do it the Roman way, with the IIII. If one wishes to be modern, or logically consistent, then one still doesn't use "IV", but rather "4".
Is the roman numeral llll still used on modern clocks?
No, the Roman numeral for 4 is IV, not llll. The use of llll is a common mistake, but traditional Roman numeral representations on clocks and other time-related devices use IV instead of llll for the numeral 4.
Why do some watches using Roman numerals choose to use IIII for the number four rather than the correct IV?
While IV can be seen as a simplification of IIII, one reason that IIII is used instead of IV is - if you look at the watch symmetrically - with a line down the center - VIII and IIII appear symmetrical to each other and thus IIII is seen as being more aesthetically pleasing than IV. Legend has it that the Romans themselves would have used IIII instead of IV because the letters IV were also in the name of one of their Gods. This is probably apocryphal since subtractive notation was introduced in the Middle Ages, long after the fall of the Roman Empire.
What is wrong with most correctly constructed Roman numeral clocks?
Some Roman numeral clocks use IIII to represent 4, which is how most Romans would have written it. However, in order to comply with the rule that no numeral should be writen more than three times in succession the number 4 is now more correctly written as IV.
Do clocks use magnetism?
Very few clocks use magnets as part of the drive.
How do people use Weather Clocks?
Many people use weather clocks in various ways. These include with thermometers, and even some smart phone applications have weather clocks available.
Why do some clocks use llll for 4 instead of lV?
It goes right back to the Roman times when the ancient Romans would never ever use IV for four for fear of offending their greatest of Gods whose name was Jupiter which in the Latin language begins with IV thus it would seem that it would reduce their God to a number and not a name and so IIII was always used which has the identical value of IV meaning 5-1 = 4
Do clocks use energy?
do clocks use energey
