if u want to execute high priority interrupt,at that time of low priority running.So, we can mask the low priority interrupt and execute the high priority interrupt.
Interrupt are automatically disabled on interrupt entry (except for TRAP, which is non-maskable) so that interrupts do not, by default, nest. You would also disable enterrupts surrounding a critical section of code that, perhaps, manipulated an interrupt register. It is possible to re-enable interrupts during an interrupt service routine. Typically, you would have a hierarchy, such as RST7.5, then RST 6.5, then RST 5.5. Initially, at interrupt entry, all interrupts are disabled. You could then manipulate the interrupt mask using the RIM and SIM instructions and enable further interrupts, allowing a nested architecture. At interrupt exit, then, you would disable interrupts, reset the mask, enable interrupts, and return from interrupt.
The Linux kernel does not run with interrupts disabled. Otherwise none of your hardware nor any pre-emptive multitasking would even work.In fact, system calls work vie software interrupts. Withour interrupts your applications can't even run.Every now and then a kernel may want to MASK interrupts, which allows the kernel to ignore certain interrupts if it's too busy or has no need to service them. Or there are non-maskable interrupts, which the kernel cannot ignore. Those are usually interrupts caused by important hardware, such as the system timer, and the CPU itself.
Non Maskable interrupts (such as those generated by power failure) cannot be blocked by the CPU. Maskable interrupts are common device interrupts such as disk/network adapters interrupts which can be blocked by the CPU.
If you disable a maskable interrupt that has any kind of important timing function, such as a system clock, by more than the allowable tolerance for that function, then your system is not going to function correctly. Your system design must consider that certain functions must be able to be processed in a certain time. If you cannot do this, you either need to redesign/reorganize your processing routine(s), you need to change the requirements of your system, or you need to get a faster processor. Sometimes you can disable interrupts for a short period of time and delay the processing of new interrupts, so long as no interrupts are missed, and so long as the end result is that the required functionality is met. Processing bytes from a UART, for instance, could be delayed so long as the average throughput was maintained and so long as the UART's internal FIFO does not overflow. This is just an example. Each case is evaluated on its own merits.
Interrupts originate from hardware or software events that require immediate attention from the CPU. Hardware interrupts are generated by devices such as keyboards, mice, or network cards to signal that they need processing, while software interrupts can be triggered by system calls or exceptions in programs. These interrupts allow the CPU to respond quickly to changing conditions or requests, ensuring efficient multitasking and system responsiveness.
You will need the proof that she is disabled. You can get this information from your doctor if you need it.
Do disabled residents need a fishing license in Indiana. Disabled but not a veteran. Lung cancer.
There are many adaptations that might need to be made to the home of a disabled person. Examples of adaptions that might need to be made to the home of a disabled person includes a handicapped friendly shower and a low to the ground bed.
The 8085 has a 16 bit address bus. As such, it can access 216, or 65,536 bytes. System design, of course, will place limits on that, as you need to share this space with code, data, and stack.
none
you need to get your chat disabled then get it deleted
Writing a hex program for the 8051 microcontroller on an 8085 microprocessor is not directly feasible, as they are based on different architectures and instruction sets. The 8051 uses its own assembly language and has features like built-in I/O ports and timers that are not present in the 8085. However, you can create a similar program in 8085 assembly language that performs equivalent tasks, keeping in mind the differences in hardware capabilities and instruction sets. You would need to carefully translate the logic and functionality from the 8051 program to suit the 8085 environment.