Mainly I think these are people who oppose anything to do with nuclear power
It is a ... mixed blessing. It won't produce carbon dioxide, and thus it should reduce global heating. However, there is currently no safe way to get rid of the nuclear wastes, which are also quite dangerous. I believe ecologists normally oppose nuclear energy, for this reason.It is a ... mixed blessing. It won't produce carbon dioxide, and thus it should reduce global heating. However, there is currently no safe way to get rid of the nuclear wastes, which are also quite dangerous. I believe ecologists normally oppose nuclear energy, for this reason.It is a ... mixed blessing. It won't produce carbon dioxide, and thus it should reduce global heating. However, there is currently no safe way to get rid of the nuclear wastes, which are also quite dangerous. I believe ecologists normally oppose nuclear energy, for this reason.It is a ... mixed blessing. It won't produce carbon dioxide, and thus it should reduce global heating. However, there is currently no safe way to get rid of the nuclear wastes, which are also quite dangerous. I believe ecologists normally oppose nuclear energy, for this reason.
Yes, most advanced countries are either building nuclear or considering it, but there are always groups who oppose it as well, so it depends what you mean by 'widely'
If it is stored in the nucleus, it must be nuclear energy.
Yes, nuclear energy is energy.
Nuclear energy
Nuclear fusion produces nuclear energy
The energy released is nuclear energy.
Uranium is used as nuclear fuel in nuclear reactors.
Nuclear energy and renewable energy are not related. Renewable energy does not use nuclear energy.
Nuclear energy is converted to electrical energy in a nuclear power plant.
What is the question