Lords, because they were higher up the feudal tree.
Serfs. Being at the bottom of the social hierarchy meant that serfs did the bulk of the work and produced most of the goods, but the only benefit that they gained from the feudal system was the protection of their lords, which would oftentimes amount to no protection at all.
chino
no....i think it was 700 ad but im not sure -_-
Because they wannted to have some independence.
The Catholic Encyclopedia has a good article on the Knights Templars. The link is below this answer, under "related links."
Lords benefited more from feudalism as they owned the land and had control over the peasants who worked it. Knights, on the other hand, were lower-ranking nobles who served the lords in exchange for land and protection. This system allowed lords to accumulate wealth and power while knights served as their military force.
serf, nobles, kings, knights!! i think! :)
Serfs. Being at the bottom of the social hierarchy meant that serfs did the bulk of the work and produced most of the goods, but the only benefit that they gained from the feudal system was the protection of their lords, which would oftentimes amount to no protection at all.
i think you need to talk to a guy in residential 082 and tells bit about the Ebon hawks theft
Answering "Do you think the western Europe model of feudalism is applicable to India?"
I think it's "the house of lords"
do you think filipino people benefited from rizal's travel abraod?
the Europeans
I think you mean this test: Freedon Nadd Twenty Gizka I always lie passion - strength - power - victory That should be it.
I think Jedi Knights because they have hot light savers.
yes
chino