Want this question answered?
Cell Theory
me and your mom
Yes, because if enough people prove the hypothesis and produce evidence supporting it it can become a theory.
Everybody has diff ideas. They all think that they are right. There is enough evidence to support a theory but not a law.
Scientist use scientific methods to test the new theory. They also examine all the evidence to see if it supports the new theory. Scientist accept a new theory when many test and pieces of evidence support it.
osama bin laden and adolf Hitler
"Evidence". There's no special term to distinguish evidence supporting one theory in science from evidence supporting any other theory in science.
Cell Theory
cell theory
Galileo
There is no evidence supporting it, and all the more evidence supporting the less controversial models of human evolution, based on evolutionary theory.
Ir is an argument, not a theory. Claims the living world is too complex to have been evolved. Generally used by people totally ignorant of evolutionary processes and has no supporting evidence.
Democritus
me and your mom
The red shift doesn't just indicate that there is evidence for the Big Bang theory: the Hubble red shift is evidence supporting the Big Bang theory.
No. A theory is more certain: it is a hypothesis which has had some supporting evidence.
plato G all of the above