Want this question answered?
The four main Celtic festivals which are remembered today are Beltane,Lughnasadh,Imbolc, and Samhain.
No
i don't know but i think it was destroyed by Indians
If we didn't know what happened in the past, then we won't understand what happens in the future.
Monarchy has been the go to form of government since the beginning of time. Theoretically a monarchy is practical. People elect one person to power and let the elected official handle problems that effect people on an individual level but are too large for the individual to handle themselves (i.e. a war or a bad economy). Unfortunately, time has shown that power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. It is because of the power hungry corrupt officials that monarchy has lost some of the confidence entrusted in the system. For example, in Great Britain, the Magna Carta of 1215 began the reduction of monarch power that continued until the monarchs assumed the figurehead role that they hold today.
In the queens chamber!
The King of Saudi Arabia today is an absolute ruler.
Any king, queen, emperor or empress that holds absolute power over a nation or territory. Autocratic implies this person is ruthless, coercive, makes bad decisions at times, does not listen to advice, and simply does as he or she pleases. the closest I think we have today is the head of the military regime in Myanmar (Burma) and Kim Jong Il of North Korea. while they're not called "kings," they act and have the same power as absolute, autocratic monarchs. I'd call they tyrants or despots.
If we talk about the still-reigning monarchs of today: the kings of Holland and Belgium and the Queen of Great Britain
There are only 7500 in the wild
yes.
Saudi Arabia
Two of the remaining fourteen contestants will leave X Factor today.
The two options are not contrary to each other and, therefore, there are really two distinct questions here:(1) Is absolute monarchy an acceptable or unacceptable system of government?This is a question of philosophy. In today's day and age, absolute monarchy is largely seen as illegitimate on the grounds that (1) monarchs do not have some special blood or calling and have no inherent right to rule and (2) the idea of concentrating all power in a single person leads to tyranny. However, for most of human history, absolute monarchs were the prevailing form of government. Every Chinese Dynasty prior to 1911 was an absolute monarchy. All 3000 years of Ancient Egyptian Civilization were presided over by absolute monarchs. At those times, people did genuinely believe that the monarch had a divine right to rule over the population and considered absolute monarchy to be acceptable. Today, in countries like Saudi Arabia, the Emirates, and Oman, where absolute monarchies are still in power, most of the subjects approve of the monarchy.(2) Is absolute monarchy a government that can succeed or is doomed to failure?Given that absolute monarchies have survived for far longer than any other kind of regime, to speak of such governments as being doomed to failure is something rather curious. The view that absolute monarchy will eventually be completely phased out comes from the view that history lies along a trajectory towards a better tomorrow. However, history is not a straight line of progression. There are innumerable examples of history where a progressive civilization is overrun or succumbs to severe political changes which make it more reactionary and regressive. These show that it is more than likely that absolute monarchy will continue to be a part of the human endeavor for many decades, if not centuries and millenia to come.
There are still MIA's.
Presently, 44 nations in the world have monarchs acting as heads of state, 16 of which are Commonwealth realms that recognize Queen Elizabeth II as their head of state. The historical form of absolute monarchy is retained only in Brunei, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Swaziland and Vatican City.
I dk