They are forming a picture based on sound waves arriving from a target in space, not an actual visual picture. They work better for determining what types of radiation is being emitted by the extraterrestrial object and conclusions can be made about it's makeup based on past data collected Check out the link provided for more information. Answer
Resolution on a telescope is determined by the wavelength of the light they use. The smaller the wavelength the better the resolution. The wavelength of radio waves can vary from a couple of metres to several kilometers long, so they do not give a clear image. Also they are forming a picture based on radio waves coming from a target many lightyears away, so there is often a big margin of error.
The angular resolution of any scope depends on its aperture measured in wavelengths
of the signal it's trying to resolve.
For comparison, pick one of the many signals that radio telescopes are used for ...
the H2 spin transition at 1420 MHz ... and one of the many signals that optical scopes
are used for ... red light.
Wavelength of 1420 MHz = 21.13 cm
Wavelength of red light = 0.00007 cm
Ratio of wavelengths = 301,857
So ... in order to provide the same angular resolution as a 2-inch optical scope,
a radio telescope would need a dish about 9.5 miles in diameter.
Does that help clarify the picture ?
Cost of batteries for poorer students.
Little round wire-rims called "granny glasses". No they are not "granny " glasses. They ARE called "Englishman working glasses".....it was the poorer working class that wore these glasses.........
The saxophone was originally popular in chamber music, because it was so easy to learn. When the fad died out, dozens of instruments were taken to resale shops and pawnbrokers, where they were purchased by people who couldn't afford more expensive instruments or lessons. The poorer classes identified with blues and other roots music, which evolved into jazz.
I believe the bandwidth of ANY signal is defined as the range of frequencies that encompasses 99% of the signal's power. For an AM signal at anything less than 100% modulation, it's 2 x the highest modulating frequency. FM signals aren't that simple to characterize. "Cramer's Rule" says that the bandwidth is 2 x (peak deviation + highest modulating frequency), but as the 'modulation index' increases, that rule becomes a poorer approximation.
It was the defeat of Argentina over the Falkland Islands that made Margaret Thatcher popular. As we must remember that England was far away from Argentina, and they thought it would be difficult for England to send their navy and the R.A.F there. But England proved them wrong.
yes
Not necessarily.
If the angle of incidence is great enough, no reflective coating is needed on either the front or rear surface, because Total Internal Reflection takes place. See the related link for more details. Telescope mirror are coated with aluminum or silver on the front surface and not the back, to avoid refraction within the glass or other material, and to allow the optical qualities of the interior of the reflector support, to be much poorer than that of optical glass.
1080p is the resolution that should be used for a proector, because 720p in a prjojector would produce poorer image quality in a large size and would be overpriced as compared to 720p television.
poorer The rich are getting richer and the poor poorer.
poorer, poorest
For Richer...For Poorer was created on 1975-06-25.
The duration of For Richer For Poorer is 1800.0 seconds.
The duration of For Richer or Poorer is 1.92 hours.
For Richer or Poorer was created on 1997-12-12.
Among one of many differences is that Landsat is Polar-orbiting while GOES is geostationary. This also means that GOES is much further above the surface, so the resolution is poorer.
Cities become poorer