In science, the word "theory" is USUALLY used for well-established theoretical frameworks, that are generally accepted as being true. This is the case with the theory on protoplanets - it is generally held to be true.
Currently, the most accepted theory is that it resulted from a crash between a large planetoid (or "protoplanet") and Earth.
The protoplanet theory, which explains the formation of planets from a rotating disk of gas and dust surrounding a young star, was developed through the contributions of several scientists. Key figures include the physicist Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker and later improvements by others such as Steven J. Desch. This theory evolved from earlier models of planetary formation and has been refined through observations and simulations of protoplanetary disks.
There are several, but one of the more popular is that a protoplanet about the size of Mars originally shared Earth's orbit. It crashed into Earth, and threw off a gigantic cloud of debris that coalesced into the Moon. If you'd like to read more about this, look up "Theia", the name given to this hypothetical protoplanet.
The protoplanet theory, which explains the formation of planets from the dust and gas in a protoplanetary disk around a young star, does not have a single discoverer. Instead, it evolved from contributions by various scientists, including the work of Carl Sagan, who popularized ideas about the formation of the solar system in the 1970s. The theory builds upon earlier concepts in planetary formation, including the nebular hypothesis proposed by Immanuel Kant and Pierre-Simon Laplace in the 18th century. Over time, advancements in observational astronomy and planetary science have further refined these ideas.
1,500 years :D
An early collision by (proto) Earth with a large protoplanet..
The leading scientific theory on the origin of the moon suggests that it formed from debris left over after a giant impact between Earth and a Mars-sized protoplanet called Theia around 4.5 billion years ago. This collision resulted in the debris coalescing to form the moon in orbit around Earth.
1,500 Years .
The protoplanet hypothesis describes the formation of planets from the dust and gas present in the early solar system. It suggests that small planetesimals collided and merged to form larger celestial bodies, eventually leading to the creation of the planets we see today.
Yes, that is how Earth's formed, it hit a large protoplanet called Theia.
I think you mean "protoplanet hypothesis". In fact, astronomers usually call it the Nebular Hypothesis A protoplanet is a planet-like object that hasn't fully developed into a planet. Why that hypothesis? It's because it is the best we have to describe the origin of the solar system according to the Laws of Physics.
The protoplanet hypothesis originated from the need to explain the formation of planets in a systematic way, based on observations of protoplanetary disks around young stars. It suggests that dust and gas in these disks coalesce through processes like accretion and gravitational attraction, leading to the formation of larger bodies, or protoplanets. This hypothesis is supported by the laws of physics, including gravity and conservation of angular momentum, and aligns with the observed structure of our solar system and others. Ultimately, it provides a coherent framework for understanding the transition from dust clouds to planetary systems.