Pure Democracy cannot cure the mischief of faction because if the faction is a majority, than they will pursue their interests at the expense of national welfare.
Pure Democracy cannot cure the mischief of faction because if the faction is a majority, than they will pursue their interests at the expense of national welfare. [majority rules does not necessarily guarantee an appropriate outcome]
Madison concludes that a pure democracy cannot effectively address the issues of faction because it is prone to the tyranny of the majority, where the majority can impose its will on minorities, leading to instability and conflict. In contrast, a republic, with its system of elected representatives and a larger sphere of governance, can mitigate the effects of faction by diluting their influence and promoting a more deliberative process. This structure allows for a greater diversity of interests and opinions, making it more difficult for any single faction to dominate. Thus, a republic is better equipped to balance competing interests and promote the common good.
the cure of her sickness was as pure as water.
pure
No, the United States does not have a pure democracy. It is a democratic republic where citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf. This system allows for a balance between direct democracy and representative democracy.
pure, sure, manure,
In a representative democracy, people vote for representatives to vote on specific issues on their behalf.
Athens-------APEX =)
In its pure form, in modern nations, no.
To make a pure democracy in Morocco .
because the republicanism is better than pure democracy
That depends on the State's constitution, if it has one. But in a pure, absolute democracy, all citizens are granted the right to vote.